This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The author of the original text has emailed to say he is happy to be quoted verbatim as long as he is properly cited and sourced. I have asked if he has a handy link to his terms and conditions. --Vometia (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So in theory everything is probably fine as it seems it was properly cited etc but things being what they are I suppose we need something a bit more formal than "it's okay because somebody emailed me to say so".
File:PKP LMG.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]
An image used in this article, File:PKP LMG.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
Unless I'm missing something, how does the Guardian article state that Venezuela is going to replace its MAGs with PKPs in 2018? It's just some article about UK weapons exports.
Thom430 (talk) 09:57, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. If you want to try this again in future it would be worthwhile dropping notes at the firearms and milhist wikiprojects to try and get some more commentators who are knowledgeable about the topic. Jenks24 (talk) 09:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.