Contents

Talk:Palace of Whitehall

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United Kingdom Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. England Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. London Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture: Historic houses High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Top-importance). Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 11 dates. [show] January 4, 2006, January 4, 2007, January 4, 2008, January 4, 2009, January 4, 2010, January 4, 2012, January 4, 2014, January 4, 2016, January 4, 2019, January 4, 2022, and January 4, 2024

The date of the 1698 fire is unclear. Palace of Whitehall is listed on January 4 and Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/January 4, but John Evelyn's diary entry is dated January 2, so the 4th would seem to be incorrect. Anyone have a source for this date? howcheng {chat} 18:38, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One year later, I found my own answer. The originally cited source was in error; I've now cited Evelyn's diary directly. howcheng {chat} 23:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, the partial drawing you have listed in the article as a design by Wren for a new Whitehall is not drawn by Wren. It was made by Nicholas Hawksmoor, Wren's draughtsman at the time, under Wren's direction. See Anthony Geraghty's text on Wren's All Souls (Oxford) drawings for more details/references etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laidac (talk • contribs) 17:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Palace of Whitehall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080115101608/http://www.measuringworth.com/aboutus.htmltohttp://www.measuringworth.com/aboutus.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100203154255/http://www.hrp.org.uk/BanquetingHouse/stories/timelineBanqueting.aspxtohttp://www.hrp.org.uk/BanquetingHouse/stories/timelineBanqueting.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728103846/http://www.pastscape.org/hob.aspx?hob_id=404943tohttp://www.pastscape.org/hob.aspx?hob_id=404943

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]