| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pathé article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Pathé received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from Pathé was copied or moved into List of Pathé films. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
As Gaumont, Pathe also claims to have a massive film archive that they distribute under thier banner. From my research many of these films are public domain. Please refer to thier website [1]. Again, this was gone through with the other article American Mutoscope and Biograph Company, yet never questioned on this article. I invite editors to research this, and happy editing!
Cheers! --Roger the red 09:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
what is the relationship to British Pathe? and who owns what exactly? as the General trust article states this organisation is owned by them but there is no mention of that group as owners on this page, or of it being a british film studio at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.71.85 (talk) 21:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article states "Although the company continued to make a profit (as noted above), it lost more money than it could bring in."
If an entity loses more money that it brings in, that is called a "loss" - not a "profit"! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.172.160.41 (talk) 09:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Pathé. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
