This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofNew York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Dunno how to use Wikipedia but "The festivities were transmitted to the public via radio in the ****first international coast-to-coast broadcast****.[citation needed]" is clearly wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.80.96 (talk) 20:18, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the first sentence to read "source", not "mouth". A river's mouth is where it empties into another body of water downstream. [kcdc123] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcdc123 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
One of the middle paragraphs has "Buffalo became the chief port of entry to Canada from the United States." Isn't that the wrong way around? Should it not be either or both of "Fort Erie became the chief port of entry to Canada from the United States" or "Buffalo became the chief port of entry to the United States from Canada"? --papageno (talk) 03:36, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Two suggestions regarding the history section. 1) include a construction picture. There are good pictures on the web - it would be wonderful if we could figure out licensing and include one. 2) The piers are clearly not original, comparing old and newer photos. Replacing the piers must have been a massive job. It would be great to have this addressed in the history section. 144.71.77.244 (talk) 13:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]