Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Further improvements for GA status  
1 comment  




2 A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion  
1 comment  




3 "international honour" section is mostly all bad  
1 comment  




4 GA review invalidated  
1 comment  




5 IPA needed?  
1 comment  




6 GA Review  
115 comments  


6.1  Preliminary spot checks  





6.2  Lead  





6.3  History  





6.4  Geography  





6.5  Governance and politics  





6.6  Demographics  





6.7  Economy  





6.8  Culture  





6.9  Education, Healthcare  





6.10  Media  





6.11  Transport  





6.12  Utilities  





6.13  Overall  
















Talk:Penang




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Further improvements for GA status[edit]

This article can still be further improved for it to be of GA standard. Will get to it soon. In the meantime, any form of assistance or suggestions from editors are greatly appreciated.

Based on other articles on sub-division level territories, such as Hong Kong, Sabah and Sarawak, the content on NGOs, military installations, galleries and even the state's firsts are not an absolute requirement for a GA. Vnonymous (talk) 10:58, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:07, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"international honour" section is mostly all bad[edit]

The "International honor and utilities" section is mostly, but not entirely, terrible. Most entries are low-effort tourist pablum list-of entries from random newspapers, websites, and magazines. These "list of places with the best street food" or "best places to retire that you've never heard of" listicles are throwaway filler that newspapers pad their pages with to sell travel ads. There's no honor to be had from being listed there, and none of these entries should be listed here. They are factually and encyclopedically worthless. But there's a few entries in this list that are notable - really the two UNESCO entries. That's all, really. And neither has a reference. I'm inclined to just remove all the rest, source the UNESCO ones, and I think the article would be entirely the better for it. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 20:02, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review invalidated[edit]

The GA review in 2018 was conducted by User:Semi-auto, a sockpuppet of the nominator, User:Vnonymous. Because self-reviews of nominations are not allowed at GAN, the original review has been invalidated and the GA status stripped from the article. This does not prevent the article from being nominated again at some point in the future, and an independent GA review being conducted at that time. (Discussion about this was brought to ANI, and also at WT:GAN.) BlueMoonset (talk) 01:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IPA needed?[edit]

It looks like the oral spelling of Penang could be in different targets, some call it Pen-ang and some Pe(e)-nang. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:04, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Penang/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: HundenvonPenang (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 09:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC) Reviewing per request. I hope I'll have enough time to look thoroughly.[reply]

Preliminary spot checks[edit]

Lead[edit]

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ZKang123. Glad to see your feedback. Will be making amendments as we go along. hundenvonPG (talk) 12:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More to come for the subsequent sections. Please bear in mind to provide page numbers for book sources.--ZKang123 (talk) 05:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geography[edit]

Continued.

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 12:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Governance and politics[edit]

Demographics[edit]

. More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 03:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:14, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Economy[edit]

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 05:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I haven't been getting back to this; I have other things on my plate at the moment.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Feel free to circle back whenever it's convenient. hundenvonPG (talk) 04:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Culture[edit]

Education, Healthcare[edit]

Media[edit]

Transport[edit]

Utilities[edit]

Many thanks ZKang123 for the thorough review. Pretty sure all points have been addressed, but feel free to add on if there's any I misssed. hundenvonPG (talk) 12:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok almost there. Just going over the recent changes and remarks. I think it's also fine to mention that Penang's education system is the same as the federal level, saying that education in Penang is under the purview of the federal government. Also, are you sure reservoirs are mentioned in the utilities section or in the article at all? Cos I don't find it.
Overall the edits are good. Just a little more.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks I've just expanded on education being under federal jurisdiction, with some elaboration.
And yes, the reservoirs are mentioned under 'utilities':
"To counter water supply disruptions, PBAPP has contingency plans in place to draw water from alternative sources such as Ayer Itam Dam, Teluk Bahang Dam and Mengkuang Dam". hundenvonPG (talk) 14:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overall[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a(prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b(MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): Some bits might get unencyclopedic, with a little more polish in the language.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a(references):
    b(citations to reliable sources): Taken mostly from Malaysian and Penang news sources, alongside scholarly research.
    c(OR):
    d(copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a(major aspects): A couple of gaps needing some clarity.
    b(focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a(images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): Photos are under CC license or PD
    b(appropriate use with suitable captions): Optional to add alt text.

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

That's all for me. Putting on hold as concerns are being addressed.--ZKang123 (talk) 07:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Satisfied with all changes. Passed--ZKang123 (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Penang&oldid=1222717953"

Categories: 
Wikipedia good articles
Geography and places good articles
GA-Class vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia vital articles in Geography
GA-Class level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Geography
GA-Class vital articles in Geography
GA-Class Southeast Asia articles
Mid-importance Southeast Asia articles
WikiProject Southeast Asia articles
GA-Class Malaysia articles
High-importance Malaysia articles
WikiProject Malaysia articles
GA-Class Islands articles
WikiProject Islands articles
Selected anniversaries (August 2007)
Selected anniversaries (August 2011)
Selected anniversaries (August 2012)
Selected anniversaries (August 2014)
Selected anniversaries (August 2015)
Hidden category: 
Selected anniversaries articles
 



This page was last edited on 7 May 2024, at 14:52 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki