![]() | Pengkhianatan G30S/PKI is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 30, 2014. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | Afact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 4, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Pengkhianatan G30S/PKI (Treachery of G30S/PKI) may have become the most-viewed Indonesian film of all time because of its use for pro-Suharto propaganda?
| ||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
|
Reviewing |
|
Reviewer: Dwaipayanc (talk · contribs) 15:39, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Doing...--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:39, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I will resume the ga review soon. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:32, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Gerald Waldo Luis, please stop edit warring. Per BRD, you made a bold edit which I reverted. It is now time to DISCUSS, not edit war. Your edit was a poor one. What is a "relatively high budget"? Why take "propaganda" out of the lead when it is one of the most important aspects of the article and needs to e in the first paragraph? Why excessive wording around the use of the film since Suharto fell? Why remove the very brief sentences that outline the film (a common aspect of well-written articles)? The edits represented a backward step. it's one of the reasons we have the WP:FAOWN policy, although why you don't seen to think you need to worry about it is something of a concern, as the edits here definitely needed to be discussed (and rejected) first. - 2A00:23C7:2B86:9800:89A0:C5A6:BF92:D084 (talk) 09:31, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If roles are described outside of the plot summary, keep such descriptions concise. Interpretations in the form of labels (e.g. protagonist, antagonist, villain, main character) should be avoided. A well-written plot summary should convey such roles.” (my bolding). It doesn’t matter that reliable sources call someone a hero or antagonist, we don’t. 2A01:4C8:493:C185:977:9226:6BD1:1858 (talk) 17:08, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]