Contents

Talk:Peter L. Berger

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Sociology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity: Theology / Lutheranism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by theology work group. This article is supported by WikiProject Lutheranism (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

[edit]

Peter L. Berger. Invitation to Sociology

Yes, but why, and what? If you want to add it to the article, just be bold and do it! -- till we ☼☽ | Talk 19:45, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)

//

If he died in 1984, how could he have received. Prize in 2010 ???? I don't believe he's dead — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.170.9 (talk) 04:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As one of the most influential sociology books of the 20th century, it seems odd to have next to nothing of the many critiques that have been mounted of the work, either here or in the substantive article on the book itselfActio (talk) 20:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] suggests Wikipedia page is remiss for not including his work supporting tobacco industry. -Pengortm (talk) 17:33, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the section entitled "The reality of everyday life" there is a passage that is unclear. The passage "Humans perceive the other in these interactions as more real than they would themselves" needs to be edited and made clearer. Could someone who is more versed in the work of Berger and Luckmann edit the phrasing to make it clearer. Iss246 (talk) 19:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]