The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
|
Reviewing |
|
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MyCatIsAChonk (talk · contribs) 00:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't know this nom existed! I found it, of all places, on the talk page of the nominator of todays TFA- was looking for an old DYK hook and found your comment on the last GA review. How disappointing- happy to pick it back up! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 00:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Prose is clear and free of typos | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | No fiction, words to watch, or lists- lead is well-written. No MOS violations present. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Refs are placed in a proper "References" section. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | All citations are to reliable sources; most books, but some are reliable websites too | |
2c. it contains no original research. | I don't see a need for a spotcheck- besides, most sources are offline, so I can confidently AGF. Article is well-cited, especially in the "Music" section- no OR visible. | |
2d. it contains no copyright violationsorplagiarism. | Earwig shows no violations. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Addresses the background, music, premieres, and reception- all good. | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Great work on the trimming- article stays focused throughout | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | No bias visible. | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit warring. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Images are properly PD tagged. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Images are relevant and properly captioned | |
7. Overall assessment. |
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.