It is requested that an imageorphotographofPrincipality of Hutt Riverbeincluded in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Micronations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronationsWikipedia:WikiProject MicronationsTemplate:WikiProject MicronationsMicronations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Principality of Hutt River is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
On 8 August 2020, Channel 9 "60 Minutes" had a story by reporter ("Sir") Brady Halls in which "Prince" Leonard Casley showed on a wall of the reception area not only that letter from the Palace but also annual letters from the Australian Taxation Office, starting in 1996. That for the tax year ending 30 June 2005 states: "Your taxable income is nil" and『You have been deemed to be a non-resident of Australia for income tax purposes—no tax-free threshold is available to non-residents.』Errantius (talk) 10:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
Why are the predecessor and successor countries in the infobox the State of Western Australia? Should they not be a sovereign state (ie, Australia)? Arecaceæ2011 (talk) 03:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Since, to the extent that it can be said to have existed at all, it was putatively sovereign, not a putatively a part of Australia separate from Western Australia. Its predecessor and successor are the soverign nation that now control the territory. I've changed it. Largoplazo (talk) 02:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have several photographs I'd be happy to upload from a personal visit in 2010, including the territory itself, Leonard Casley, the passport visa stamp issued to visitors, etc. What would be of value and interest to this article? ElectronicsForDogs (talk) 09:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]