Contents

Talk:Project West Ford

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force United States: Military history / Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). Cold War Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jan 2018[edit]

Why is the inclination of remaining debris scattered globally at the stuffinspace link, if there were only 2 specific inclinations (only 9 degrees apart) in the original launch? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.240.32.96 (talk) 17:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

because variations in drag eventually result in variations in altitude, and then nodal precession happens relatively more quickly at the relatively lower altitude. 135.180.194.177 (talk) 22:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it that the article for this page is the exact same text as the one from this: http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=516

?

69.249.146.101 22:46, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was copy/pasted from there... Even the pictures... --Falcorian ^(talk) 01:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Сраные пендосы — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.255.165.56 (talk)

13:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Potty mouth. 86.184.196.105 (talk) 23:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What substance keeps the clumps together? Will the binding component disintegrate over time ? Glue ? Napalm ? 51.174.226.245 (talk) 12:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's just that all the needles are on a similar orbit, so they travel around together. --Falcorian ^(talk) 19:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I belive it is spot wielding, as this video suggests. - 56independent (talk) 21:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not anymore! I gave it a B-class. Nicely sourced and chock full of information. Thank you. --Neopeius (talk) 05:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is currently inconsistent, when it should consistently use one form or the other. If both are correct, one form should be chosen for the article, and the other should be noted in the "also known as" section at the top. 108.246.204.20 (talk) 05:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

😩😩😩 212.219.116.90 (talk) 15:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article says nothing about whether the 8 MHz radio tests made successful use of this artificial ionosphere or not. Does anyone know? Thanks Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 04:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]