Contents

Talk:Putin. Corruption

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Russia: Politics and law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force.

Suggest move[edit]

Shouldn't this be moved to Putin: Corruption? The full stop (period) may work in Russian but it is not English style. Rothorpe (talk) 23:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I support this move. Its a simple, easy move that would better reflect the title. As it stands now, without being italicized, the article title looks like a grammatical error. DaltonCastle (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: I erred when I said it would require a move. Not even. Just needs a formatting code. Will do now. DaltonCastle (talk) 01:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...And more reliable sources besides blogs of authors and their cronies?--91.79.238.181 (talk) 15:17, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is blatant propaganda. Wikipedia is becoming a joke. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.118.175 (talk) 06:16, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let me ask again: Criticism section? Where is it? There is a Central Asian saying: "Repeat 'chalva, chalva' - no sweeter in the mouth." Repeat "propaganda" - article no better. -M.Altenmann >t 03:43, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the notability tag, as this page does meet general notability guidelines due its covering by several sources. Since I am no expert in the Russian language, however, I cannot comment on the other tag. If someone could find non-partisan sources, or even sources from an ideological opponent, it would suffice. DaltonCastle (talk) 01:30, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Putin. Corruption. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120325014658/http://www.rusolidarnost-msk.ru/obzor_blogov/2552-elizaveta-prihodina-otklonenie.htmltohttp://www.rusolidarnost-msk.ru/obzor_blogov/2552-elizaveta-prihodina-otklonenie.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]