Contents

Talk:RADARSAT

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ewoodard024, Cobi0445, Malcolmshepler, Morgan S, Tyler.reyes.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 07:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2020 and 14 March 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): RitaSherwood, Jacob Hirsh, Haay4855.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 07:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the most useful thing to add to this page would be a quick overview of both the Radarsat-1 and Radarsat-2. A quick overview of the mission and the reasons behind it would be great for Radarsat-1, and the improvements made to the Radarsat mission with the second satellite could be described for Radarsat-2. Is there anything else that might be good in these sections? Also, there could be a small section outlining the applications of this mission. Ewoodard024 (talk) 17:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it could maybe be useful to include some of the key people that have been involved with the RADARSAT program. Possibly the heads of the programs.Tyler.reyes (talk) 03:56, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good. This sounds like it could fit nicely in with an overview, perhaps with Radarsat-1 in describing who the mission is headed by and any significant roles they may play. -Ewoodard024 (talk) 19:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So I think it is important to note that largest consumers of RADARSAT data and why they use such data.

For example, the Canadian Ice Service (CIS) is one of the largest consumers of the RADARSAT-1 data. Since RADARSAT data is readily available in near-real time, it is the best source of information to use for coastal monitoring, ship detection and maritime ice navigation. Once the CIS has processed the data, it is then released to marine clients such as the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG).^[1]

Also I'm a rookie on here when it comes to citing, so please tell me if its not right. And comment if anything is actually untrue or there are missing pieces.

I agree, this is useful information. This sounds like it could fit in nicely with the section I proposed about applications of the Radarsat mission. Who, for what, and how people are using this data would be great things to include. Also, while I'm not sure about the accuracy of your citation, one thing to note would be that after posting something on the talk page, you need to apply a signature so that people know it is you. This is done by adding four tildes (~) at the end of your post. -Ewoodard024 (talk) 19:11, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on RADARSAT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060818111718/http://www.directionsmag.com/companies/RADARSAT_International/tohttp://www.directionsmag.com/companies/RADARSAT_International/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]