| GA toolbox |
|---|
|
|
| Reviewing |
|
|
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jclemens (talk · contribs) 04:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Quite clear and straightforward, really. |
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Fine |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | The final quotation in the "House of Lords judgment" segment needs a reference, but it's entirely obvious from context that's exactly what's being depicted there. |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | See above. |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | Nose noted. |
|
|
2d. it contains no copyright violationsorplagiarism. | None identified with Earwig's tool. |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Appropriate. |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Appropriate. |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Appropriately dispassionate discussion of a volatile, emotion-laden subject. |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Fine. |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Fine. |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | There's only the one coat of arms, and I don't suspect we'll get more. About the only thing I can think to add would be Henry Keith, Baron Keith of KinkelorGeoffrey Lane, Baron Lane but neither has one in his article either. |
|
|
7. Overall assessment. | Passing it with my single tweak. Excellent work. |
Actually, since the missing citation was pretty obvious and the only thing needed to sign off on the article, I've just gone ahead and added it. Jclemens (talk) 04:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
