Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Generic mood in German  
2 comments  




2 Desirable  
2 comments  




3 Aspect  
1 comment  




4 Suggestion  
1 comment  




5 Abbreviation  
2 comments  




6 Related pages are missing  
1 comment  




7 Move to Indicative mood  














Talk:Realis mood




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Generic mood in German

[edit]

What is meant by "In German, the same effect is obtained by the introduction of a particle," in the Generic mood section? I don't think this is right, but I can't find anything definite. German works similar to English in that the "Generic" mood can be formed by omitting the article, but a definite article can also be used. e.g. "Hasen sind schnell" translates as "Rabbits are fast," but "Die Hasen sind schnell" could be translated as "Rabbits are fast," or "The rabbits are fast," depending on context. --Okj579 (talk) 16:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed this section, because it was not written about the generic mood. It was put into the wrong section when it was moved over from Grammatical Mood (Original edit) Okj579 (talk) 05:09, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Desirable

[edit]

The article refers to the subjunctive as referring to something desirable, but I don't think that's right, on two counts. First, if it's used that way, it ought to be equally applicable to things that are undesirable. Second, it can be used for possible outcomes which are neither desirable nor undesirable. "I doubt that he be a professor", is, I think, subjunctive, but this subject isn't my forte. --Marshall "Unfree" Price 172.56.27.84 (talk) 01:13, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"I doubt that he be a professor" would be a misuse of the subjunctive I think. In that statement, the speaker is expressing doubt about a 'fact'. The speaker is expressing the idea that 'That man is not a professor.' "I don't recommend he be a professor in the future" would be subjunctive. Here, the man in question is not a professor, and the speaker thinks it's a bad idea for him to go that route. This has to do with the speakers view or intent.

I think a better question of "Desirable" as an accurate word or not is illustrated better another way. "My brother works a hundred hours a week. He has a big family so it's necessary that he work so hard." This is, from the speakers standpoint, both a statement of fact and the way things ought to be. ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eggmann (talkcontribs) 13:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aspect

[edit]

We got along fine without moods. Now we need aspects!? --Marshall "Unfree" Price 172.56.27.38 (talk) 01:26, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

[edit]

"... and in some dialects, the subjunctive (as in 'I suggest you be quiet')."

I'm not an academic expert on this subject, but I'm not sure that's the best example to make this point. (Let's twist around the sentence so that the verb's subjunctive nature is clear: "He suggests I be quiet" doesn't seem so much like a softened imperative.)

StevenJ81 (talk) 17:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abbreviation

[edit]

Wondering about the source for the abbreviation REAL? The Leipzig Glossing Rules, a recognised standard, does not list REAL 'realis'. --2001:569:FB62:E200:84D4:9B08:4D04:F438 (talk) 21:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the one who added the abbreviation here, but I've merely copied it from List of glossing abbreviations. I have absolutely no opinion on how common it is. Just a few thoughts. The list of abbreviations in the Leipzig Glossing Rules is simply a small set of frequently used abbreviations, there doesn't exist a standard, individual linguists choose whatever abbreviation suits their needs and consequently there's substantial variation in the literature. And at any rate, realis is usually the unmarked "mood", so the need to indicate it in glossing probably doesn't arise often, and when it does arise, I'd imagine the need is more commonly met by the use of labels for more specific subtypes, like indicative (IND: an abbreviation that happens to be included in the Leipzig list). – Uanfala (talk) 23:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I'm not sure how to fix this myself, but I see that the latvian and other pages are missing from the related pages. Maybe someone who knows their way around wikipedia can fix this.

https://lv.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%AAsten%C4%ABbas_izteiksme — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unknowledgeable (talkcontribs) 10:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Indicative mood

[edit]

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indikativ

the same set of articles in other languages aren't accessible from the current wiki. I tried adding the Realis mood to the rest but got an error.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Realis_mood&oldid=1202149920"

Categories: 
C-Class Linguistics articles
High-importance Linguistics articles
WikiProject Linguistics articles
 



This page was last edited on 2 February 2024, at 04:15 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki