This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternate History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Alternate HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Alternate HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Alternate HistoryAlternate History articles
it is very much doubtful the book's author wrote this article as it contains ludicrous wrong spelling of "it's" in place of "its" several times. WillNess (talk) 14:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Stalin knew full well about the American atomic bomb project - several communists among its scientists (and not Rosenbergs) were regularly sending detaled reports to him, as was made public since the USSR's fall in 1991. There existed a special room in Kremlin full of smuggled documentation into which only Kurchatov himself had access, and was even prohibited to write anything down while in there, and had to memorize the stuff. Later on, returning to his HQ he would dispense "advice" to his scientists who were often dumbfounded by his prowess.
Not that it is of any importance, but it seems to me that towards the end there is a slight mistake in syntax. One reads (since the Russians have more men to fight then they do with weapons to arm them). I propose a change to (since the Russians have more men than they have weapons to arm them with) or simply (since the Russians have more men than they have weapons). At least that's what I figure the author means... Alfadog777 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.70.5.146 (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]