Contents

Talk:Reed Timmer

Reed Timmer is currently an Earth sciences good article nominee. Nominated by ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) at 18:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article. Short description: American meteorologist and storm chaser

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Weather: Biographies Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Biographies task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

IP editor 204.98.124.205 (who added the tag here), I'd like to discuss the tag with you. Timmer did marry Molina in 2015, as stated in both Timmer and Molina's articles, but their divorce in 2018 I could not find a reliable source for. The closest I could get was Timmer and Molina recalling a tornado near Wray, Colorado in 2016 but does not mention the divorce. Therefore, I did remove the divorce information from Timmer's article but not Molina's, that's what I believe as to why the {{Contradicts other}} tag was added. However, if the divorce information were to be re-added to Timmer's article, then it'll have to be added with a reliable source (I couldn't find one), otherwise, I'm not sure what to do. Any ideas? ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 01:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I did find this, but I'm not sure if it's reliable or not... ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 01:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there’s no reliable source, shouldn’t it also be removed from Molina’s? 204.98.124.205 (talk) 03:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I was thinking; I think that's the best outcome in this case. ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 12:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Reed Timmer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Tails Wx (talk · contribs) 18:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 17:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm taking on this review. Reconrabbit 17:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing this GAN, Reconrabbit! I appreciate it, and I'm pretty sure I've resolved all your concerns below. :) ~ Tails Wx 01:03, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Want to let you know that I did read your changes to the article, but there might be some delay in finishing the review. I've been pretty sick the past few days. Reconrabbit 02:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, sounds good. Wishing you a speedy recovery! ~ Tails Wx 12:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tails Wx I'm a bit better now. Some more notes. Reconrabbit 14:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tails Wx I think I'm done for my part here, just have questions on source 28 and if anything was omitted in 2007, 2008 and 2014 since there seems to be some major event happening every year except for those. Reconrabbit 13:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• "Tornado warned-storm" or "tornado-warned storm"?

Yeah, it's "tornado-warned storm". ~ Tails Wx 01:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Under 2019-present, the phrase "a Dominator 3" is used. Are there multiple Dominator 3s?

Nope, there's just one! Replaced "a" with "the". ~ Tails Wx 01:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Running into some WP:PROSELINE writing under the storm chasing career, but the paragraphs are large enough for it to not make a major impact.

• A pretty clear timeline of the notable events in Reed's life, but lacks cohesion. I can see that being a consequence of the type of references used that are all "top 5 closest calls" etc.
• What did he do on Storm Chasers in 2007 (-2008?)? Did he do anything notable in 2014?

• Goes into detail on major events without repeating articles verbatim. Y
• Some concerns about due weight on his personal life, specifically his siblings' names and parents' divorce.

I did remove his siblings' names, but kept the info on his parents' divorce because it seemed...notable, in my opinion. ~ Tails Wx 01:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• No ongoing or recent edit wars.

• None found, all sources in English so no concern of translated copied material, other language Wikipedia articles have little to no overlap. Y

• List style conforms to manual of style. Y

Check sources based on this revision:

[6] Y

[9] Y

[10] Y

[11] Y

[16] Y Sentence describing the April 27, 2011 outbreak doesn't include the EF5 tornado this source supports.

[26] Y

[27] Y

[28] Y Rather than citing the book directly, I would use sources that mention the book such as Outside and Good Morning America. The whole subtitle isn't used in third party publications.

[33] Y

[41] Y

[44] Y Shows journalistic practices necessary to keep a Newsweek article here as a source.

[48] Y

[56] Y Use of Forbes contributor article is debatable but it isn't a particularly controversial statement. There is a Car and Driver article that briefly mentions Category 6 and it could be used to back this up.

[57] Y Looks to be a decent Newsweek article, same as 44.

[61] Y

[62] Y

• All statements backed up by references. Y

• Images currently in the article are tagged with attribution and licenses. Y
• There was a photo of Reed Timmer in the article before but it was deleted. Out of scope here but keep that in mind.

I split his secondary education into two sentences since I felt it was too long compared to the rest of the article. Also, it was sitting on its own there. Reconrabbit 14:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. noWP:OR () 2d. noWP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed