| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Would it make more sense to link directly to "2000 in music", instead of "2000"? The way it is written now seems a bit overwrought. BaldAdonis 03:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have to ask, where did all the references go? When did a myspace bulletin become an "encyclopedic source of information"? This entire article looks like it was written as a fan page for the band. I see quotes from their myspace account with no proof that those quotes were even said in the first place. Let's also not forget the trivia section, which also features information already incorporated in other sections of the article. 75.16.211.46 21:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
if you forget, this is wikipedia, this isnt an encyclopedic source either so quit complaining
Mjf595 (talk) 22:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)mjf595[reply]
Why is bluecollardistro.com considered spam by this? They were Jame's distributor as well as hosting both his website and forum. The forum is currently the last source of current information as vagrant has effectively dropped james because the new record was considered "too heavy" Mjf595 00:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)mjf[reply]
The History section of this article is more informative of the band's sense of humor than a real series of events. Most of the useful history of the band is outlined in the introduction. I suggest deleting this section, or making it clear that it does not describe real events in the history of the band. Rather, it seems to be a constructed mythology of the band's ostensible origins - it should be labeled as such. --Worker201 (talk) 23:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
i find it funny that you claim to have so much knowledge of Reggie, yet you still claim that it is a band, which implies that there is more than one person.
James has done this project by himself, with help during live events because he obviously cannot play the instruments by himself.Mjf595 (talk) 01:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I re-wrote the page a while back,so the history section is more, you know, historical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwiggum (talk • contribs) 14:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Reggie and the Full Effect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
