Contents

Talk:Renaissance

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Renaissance article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 60 days

Renaissance was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones Date Process Result September 11, 2004 Featured article candidate Not promoted September 30, 2006 Good article nominee Not listed May 17, 2007 Good article nominee Listed May 17, 2007 Peer review Reviewed August 31, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept July 28, 2023 Good article reassessment Delisted A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 6, 2004. Current status: Delisted good article

This  level-3 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

European history Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. History Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Philosophy: Social and political / Medieval High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Social and political philosophy Medieval philosophy Spoken Wikipedia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles

Section sizes Section size for Renaissance (41 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 5,105 5,105 Period 6,454 6,454 Overview 6,572 6,572 Origins 1,730 17,972 Latin and Greek phases of Renaissance humanism 4,728 4,728 Social and political structures in Italy 4,750 4,750 Black Death 4,442 4,442 Cultural conditions in Florence 2,322 2,322 Characteristics 20 28,146 Humanism 4,571 4,571 Humanism and libraries 1,104 1,104 Art 5,609 5,609 Science 6,617 6,617 Navigation and geography 2,192 2,192 Music 851 851 Religion 3,901 3,901 Self-awareness 3,281 3,281 Spread 749 30,946 England 3,467 3,467 France 1,991 1,991 Germany 1,224 1,224 Hungarian trecento and quattrocento 7,904 7,904 Renaissance in the Low Countries 1,470 1,470 Northern Europe 4,228 4,228 Poland 2,747 2,747 Portugal 5,150 5,150 Spain 1,930 1,930 Further countries 86 86 Historiography 20 11,281 Conception 4,104 4,104 Debates about progress 7,157 7,157 Other Renaissances 1,509 1,509 See also 229 229 References 15 2,256 Explanatory notes 45 45 Citations 31 31 General sources 2,165 2,165 Further reading 3,707 5,751 Historiography 1,737 1,737 Primary sources 307 307 External links 1,198 1,198 Total 117,419 117,419

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Movable type#Metal movable type in Europe|metal movable type]] The anchor (#Metal movable type in Europe) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Renaissance[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted per consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA from 2007. Significant unsourced material including entire unsourced sections throughout the article. I had placed comments before hand back in February stating that this would need to be fixed or i'd nominate it to be delisted and the issues still remain. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree: there are just too many unreferenced paragraphs. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeesh. Yes. It's in a pretty bad state. Getting this back to GA will be a real project. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delist - lots of effort needed to get this to GA standard. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

for example all the causes such as capture of constant people decline of dialysm discovery of new trade routes spirit of enquiry and printing press to be discussed in detail 2409:40E4:1B:3D20:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 05:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]