This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles
Lead Graph Assumes Too Much Reader Familiarity[edit]
The lead sentence simply LISTS where the Revolutionary Youth Movement exists within the history of Socialist movements in the US. The next sentence immediately uses all four acronyms from the intro to discuss these entities' interactions with each other, with no other background or context. I, for example, came here from Ghosting (identity theft), which clearly doesn't set one up for the Judean People's Front-style divisions among American leftist movements.
I get that SOME familiarity with US politics is expected, but this is a big jump.
Since it was linked from somewhere unrelated, I presume it's sufficiently Notable to be here; so why can't it be explained in terms that are relevant to the general reader? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JasCollins (talk • contribs) 21:15, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
