This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofNew York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Regardless of what people in Mr. Schimminger's office think, factual, verified information should NEVER be removed from an article. Mr. Schimminger is an elected public official. It is public knowledge that a member of his family was convicted in 2003 of stealing nearly a quarter of a million dollars from a federal education fund.
This is obviously the type of information that would be of significant interest to the voting public. It is information that they have a right to.
Someone, most likely from his office has attempted to remove this information from this article more than once. In their last edit, information such as Mr. Schimminger's re-election with 91% of the vote was included, and at the same time the information about the criminal conviction for theft and fraud of a family member was removed. Obviously articles about politicians should be "fair and balanced".
In other words, while the information about the family member is not positive, it is indeed relevant, especially to the public, who entrusts Mr. Schimminger with their well-being. Osirisascending (talk) 15:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
