Contents

Talk:Rouse Simmons

A fact from Rouse Simmons appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 January 2007. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the schooner Rouse Simmons, known as "The Christmas Tree Ship", was transporting over 5,000 Christmas treestoChicago when it sank in 1912? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/January.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chicago Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Wisconsin Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Shipwrecks Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Shipwreck-related priority open tasks: edit history watch purge To Do Lady Elizabeth (1879) Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed! Improve grammar Add any additions if needed Still adding more information Discuss desired additions -None Scuba diving Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Scuba divingWikipedia:WikiProject Scuba divingTemplate:WikiProject Scuba divingSCUBA articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This is a pretty good article, it could use some copyediting and such but it isn't far from WP:GA imo. IvoShandor 10:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to do some work on it if I get the chance, perhaps post some review like comments here. IvoShandor 10:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even though footnote 4 cites the EPA website, this information appears to be incorrect. I have contacted the EPA to learn their source. This appears to be a confusion with the "Big Blow" of 1913 (See Wikipedia article "Great Lakes Storm of 1913") I can find no other record of a large four day storm in 1912 in which ten freighters were lost and 400 men. If that were the case, then the Big Blow of 1913 would not be the greatest storm in Great Lakes history, as it is almost universally reported to be. User:RDavS

That's an interesting find, thanks. I'm not sure if November is usually "storm season" on the Great Lakes but it does seem coincidental that we have Nov 1912 here when Big Blow was Nov 1913. I'll have a little go at rewording it. violet/riga (t) 07:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the records of the Weather Bureau (http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/040/mwr-040-11-1649.pdf), November 1912 had been unusually pleasant, with above average temperatures and fewer than average storms. Only two exceptions are noted; namely, a two day storm on the 13th and 14th that affected primarily southeastern Michigan and northwestern Ohio, and the storm during which the Rouse Simmons foundered on the 23rd and 24th that affected Lake Michigan and northern Lake Huron. No unusually significant damage to shipping is noted in the report as is reported in the record of the storm of 1913.

Although violent storms have occurred also in other months, often taking ships with them, November is notorious for violent storms on the Great Lakes. The water retains more heat than the land, and when the cold blasts of early winter come charging in, that extra heat stirs things up. Particularly violent November storms were produced in 1880, 1905, 1913, 1940, and 1975. The storm of 1975 probably did not match up with the others, but because of the loss of the Edmund Fitzgerald, gained notoriety.

More than one person has confused the events of 1912 and 1913. A number have pushed the reputation of the Big Blow of 1913 into 1912 and the account of the Rouse Simmons, including one who wrote the web page for the EPA. Another pulled the account of the Rouse Simmons into the aftermath of the 1913 storm. The two events have little to do with each other, except that both happened in November. While the earlier storm of November 1912 did not hold much of a word of warning to captain and crew, the notoriety of November storms in general should have been on their minds, especially so late in the month. RDavS 20:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]