 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excellent Article
Actually a nice article... It still would be nice to see the effects or a quick note of the recommendations the Commission made.
Actually I disagree -- terrible article.
I want to be able to read a summary of what the commission's (controvertial) powers actually are, how they differ from other practice, how they have been used.
Instead all there is is a blow by blow description of the process of its formation, and very little useful information in it.
Tuntable (talk) 02:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| This is a very messily formatted articles and needs properly foramtted references to be B class.--Grahame (talk) 13:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply] |
Last edited at 13:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 05:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
