| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rush Hour 3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STOP SCRWEING WITH THE CAST LIST - WHAT IMDB LISTS IS WHAT IS OFFICIAL
Is New Line Cinema considering shooting Rush Hour 4 back-to-back with Rush Hour 3?
Jet Lee is making a movie WITH jackie chan, but i dont believe it is in the Rush Hour movies. They haven't released any information on it besides that jet lee is going to star in it.
isnt jet lee supposed to be in this film?
I don't think so. It would be funny if they got owen wilson and ben stiller in it though. Really original idea.
Rush Hour 3 is taking place in Paris, http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/703/703723p1.html. Can't wait until this film comes out.
I moved Van Damme to 'rumored', as it seems to be widely reguarded as nothing more than that, also IMDB removed him from the roster.
It's the exact same trivia as seen on Rush Hour 3's IMDB trivia page. It doesn't need to be here, if you can just read it from there...--Pix88 (talk) 01:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm hosting a better quality quicktime version of the teaser trailer, but it seems people love the youtube version? Nr1moviefan http://www.robertkaye.org/trailers/?trailer=1891&m=Rush+Hour+3 Nr1moviefan 14:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is very troubling that when an actor such as Tom Cruise makes unique salary demands, this is a fake movie it's not an issue. However, Chris Tucker is vain for realizing that he is 50% responsible for the previous films' success.
Even if that was interesting, it's not appropriate to post here. WP:SOAP Faithlessthewonderboy 13:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone know the reason why there has been a delay between rush hour 2 and 3? MatthewCHS 16:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
For the last time, Yao Ming was NEVER attached to this film -- quit posting his name on the cast list. It was a rumor during pre-production that IMDB never removed from the list. Originally, Brett Ratner wanted Yao Ming to appear in the film to recreate the Kareem Abdul Jabbar v. Bruce Lee scene in the Game of Death. Yao Ming declined due to his desire to focus on basketball. And, in China, Yao Ming is considered a sports hero -- they would never allow him to play a villain. Instead, Sun Ming Ming, a basketball hopeful, has signed on in his place. It has been confirmed since September 2006.
Here are the sources:
- USLeatherneck 20:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sun Ming Ming on set re-creating the Game of Death sequence as shown in this Rush Hour 3 youtube hosted MTV exclusive interview...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ng2DrzfdlUM
Will it really come out that soon? Khoikhoi 02:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
what about Kobe Bryant is he gonna be in it?
Why isn't there anything about the prolonged schedule and hang-ups? It's only been seven years. Wasn't Tucker adamant about doing the sequel? hbdragon88 03:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On 'The Numbers' it says that Rush Hour 3 has a $180,000,000 http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2007/RUSH3.php so is it alright to add that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.69.200.24 (talk) 23:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
What happen to the plotline? Was that accurate?
the plot is really confusing and hard to follow...someone should change that. i would but i haven't seen the movie.
Image:Rushhourposter5.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, the word "unfortunately" is entirely opinionated, and has unfortunately been included several times throughout the plot summary.
Sana 06:55, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have plac't the long plot summary tag on the article. Remove it if I am wrong. Marlith T/C 20:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I must admit, I find the reception section of the article to be overwhelmingly negative. In fact, the only really positive criticism I read there was actually ironically negative. I think we need to balance that section out a bit. For instance, most of the critics really liked the addition of the George character, and I really liked his nuanced looks of satisfaction during the car chase, too. Maybe we should add some comments from the critics about that? Cinemaniac (talk • contribs • critique) 00:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why does Lee -- a Hong Kong cop -- have a Japanese brother? They also speak Japanese together in a few scenes. Was this perhaps explained in the previous movies? Tebello TheWHAT!!?? 20:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rush Hour 4 is a possible sequal to the other Rush Hour Films with Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker. There will be a confirm to the other cast members like Danny DeVitto and Jet Li. Rush Hour 4 is coming soon in 2012. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.82.179 (talk) 01:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why was Genevieve pulling out a weapon (I believe a small pistol but I didn't see very well) when seducing Carter? 124.0.19.150 (talk) 05:46, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the section about the continuity of the character Soo Yung being older than she should be in this film, it was stated by the person who added the section that Rush Hour 2 took place right after Rush Hour, this is incorrect as director Brett Ratner specifically states in the Rush Hour 2 audio commentary that this may be Lee and Carter's second or third trip to China and it does not take place directly after the events of Rush Hour, specifically noting about how their hair is different among other things.--R.M.Hale (talk) 00:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Rush Hour 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
