Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Comment  
1 comment  




2 GA Review  
6 comments  




3 Name?  
2 comments  




4 External links modified  
2 comments  













Talk:SMS Viribus Unitis




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Good articleSMS Viribus Unitis has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit.
Good topic starSMS Viribus Unitis is part of the Battleships of Austria-Hungary series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 27, 2010Good article nomineeListed
December 6, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Comment

[edit]

My personal view is that there are too many disjointed articles on the Austro-Hungarian Navy. There is information on the Otranto Barrage and the main navy page which should be transferred here, unless duplicate information on numerous pages is acceptable, which I fear it is not. David Lauder 14:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Viribus Unitis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

1. Well-written:

There are still a few minor issues, but none significant enough to hold it back from GA. I would recommend a thorough copyedit if you wish to take the article further than GA.

2: Factually accurate and verifiable:

3: Broad in its coverage

I think that I've fixed that....--White Shadows It's a wonderful life 02:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

4: Neutral - Pass

5: Stable - Pass

6: Images

I've removed and replaced (the line drawing one) the images in question.--White Shadows It's a wonderful life 01:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall: On Hold Pass

Generally, the article's in pretty good shape. I'm giving the text a light copyedit, and there's a few other issues that need to be dealt with before it can pass its GA.

All the issues have been dealt with. This article is now GA! Well done! Cam (Chat)(Prof) 01:41, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Cam (Chat)(Prof) 01:14, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name?

[edit]

Doesn't "Viribus unitis" mean "united forces" rather than "united peoples"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.137.90.170 (talk) 19:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yepp ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on SMS Viribus Unitis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The history book Paris 1919 by Margaret MacMillan (paperback edition, 2003 Random House, ISBN 0-375-76052-0, p285) says that "The following day an Italian torpedo boat darted into Pula and sank the dreadnought Viribus Unitis, the pride of the Austrian navy, killing its Yugoslav captain and crew." There is no mention of a submarine or limpet mines. The references for this paragraph in the book are ref. 12, Chapter 22, listed as: Zivojinovic, chapters 8-10; FRUS, vols. 1, pp. 475-87.

Hope that helps in some way. Billtubbs (talk) 02:24, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:SMS_Viribus_Unitis&oldid=1207869636"

Categories: 
Wikipedia good articles
Warfare good articles
GA-Class Featured topics articles
Wikipedia featured topics Battleships of Austria-Hungary good content
Low-importance Featured topics articles
GA-Class Ships articles
All WikiProject Ships pages
GA-Class Operation Majestic Titan articles
Operation Majestic Titan articles
GA-Class Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) articles
Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) articles
GA-Class military history articles
GA-Class maritime warfare articles
Maritime warfare task force articles
GA-Class Balkan military history articles
Balkan military history task force articles
GA-Class European military history articles
European military history task force articles
GA-Class World War I articles
World War I task force articles
GA-Class Austria articles
Unknown-importance Austria articles
All WikiProject Austria pages
GA-Class Croatia articles
Low-importance Croatia articles
All WikiProject Croatia pages
GA-Class Shipwreck articles
Unknown-importance Shipwreck articles
 



This page was last edited on 15 February 2024, at 23:07 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki