Contents

Talk:Saturn I SA-2

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

How on earth is 109,000L == 86,000kg? Surely it's meant to be 109,000kg? bblow u u budda pa

Just as with SA-2 (Apollo), 2 minutes is too short of a time for the entire flight. This is probably time to peak altitude. Bubba73 ^{(You talkin' to me?)}, 01:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the articles or the sources, you can see that the rocket (the two upper stages rather) were detonated two minutes into the flight. So nothing really "landed" after two minutes obviously, that's just when the flight was terminated. KimiNewt (talk) 13:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The info box gives a "landing" at April 25, 1962 14:02:37 UTC. That needs to be fixed then. Bubba73 ^{(You talkin' to me?)}, 14:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there isn't any other option in the infobox, so it's either leaving it as landing and adding some note or just removing it, the mission duration is there anyway. Let the kids do some arithmetics, your call. KimiNewt (talk) 23:33, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If there was no landing, I think it is misleading to say that there was a landing at that specific time. Bubba73 ^{(You talkin' to me?)}, 23:37, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]