Contents

Talk:Scenes of Clerical Life

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 6, 2011, November 6, 2013, November 6, 2014, November 6, 2016, November 6, 2017, November 6, 2019, November 6, 2020, and November 6, 2022.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: Short story / 19th century Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Short story task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by 19th century task force (assessed as High-importance). This article has an infobox template in need of a 1st Edition Cover! Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I created this page to share notes that I took on the book for a class. I have no plans to expand it further. --Lavishluau (talk) 04:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I studied SoCL for my dissertation, so will see what I can add to this article. I'm new to Wikipedia, so please bear with me! El Staplador (talk) 10:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just randomly passing through, but I noticed that some of the citations are duplicated and/or formatted incorrectly. Some refs should utilize a ref tag so that one source can be used more than once. See WP:REFNAME for details on using the <ref name=""> tag. You may also consider using citation templates so that the references can be correctly and uniformly written. For example, because it's not a publication, "The Literary Encyclopedia" should not be italicized, and "Eliot, George and Gunn, Kirsty" should be written as "Eliot, George and Kirsty Gunn" -- the templates correct the need to know these nitpicky formatting issues. I hope this helps, and if you have any questions let me know. María (habla conmigo) 17:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip; I'll attend to it. El Staplador (talk) 12:36, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While there's more to be done to the Plot Summary section, it's not nearly so sparse or so inaccurate as it was, so I'm going to remove the tag.

Sorry, that was me - forgot to sign. El Staplador (talk) 14:48, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Below are some comments:

• Make syntax as straightforward as possible. I work in that period literature pretty often and I know how easy it is to become absorbed into that convaluted writing style, but most "modern" internet savy individuals, don't read that sort of stuff.
• Think of the lead as a summary of the article, not something that contains statements not discussed throughout the rest of the article. With this in mind, there should be no references or only references that include factual statements, such as statistics etc.
• Check out WP:Lead for guidance on lead length, but it should be a summary at least 2-3 paragraphs for this length of an article.
• The discussion of George Elliot's pseudonym is unneccessary in this article, leave it to the bio-page unless the whole discussion is directly relevant. You can make it a {{see also}}
• Should Evans be called "George Elliot" or "Evans" when discussing her within the context of the writing. It is confusing for the reader, esp. the posibility for pronoun confusion.
• Themes section seems underdeveloped and not fully referenced and is starting to sound like OR (currently their are several assertations that should have refs)
• I would suggest combining the plot and charachters sections into a hierarchy like below in order to keep all related info in one place:

Short Stories - this section has a brief summary

Story 1 - contains the plot of the story

Charachters - charachters of story 1

Story 2 - contains the plot of the story

Charachters - charachters of story 2

Story 3 - contains the plot of the story

Charachters - charachters of story 3

Themes, etc.

• There should be a "Style" section discussing the style as approached by reviewers (if such research is available)

I think that covers most everything, if you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page. Sadads (talk) 02:37, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are some reference errors that need fixing. I started at it and then realized it was a bigger job than I thought, so I gave up. —howcheng {chat} 08:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scenes of Clerical Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070311024801/http://www.history.com:80/encyclopedia.do?articleId=205684tohttp://www.history.com/encyclopedia.do?articleId=205684

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"By 1842 she had become agnostic, refusing to attend church with her father."

or as it says in the George Eliot article

"When Evans began to question her religious faith, her father threatened to throw her out of the house, but his threat was not carried out. Instead, she respectfully attended church and continued to keep house for him until his death in 1849..."

Neither statement appears to be referenced. Dtaylor31 (talk) 13:29, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]