Contents

Talk:Scientific Advice Mechanism

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. European Union Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Environment Low‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missing Wikipedia pages for some members of the Group of Chief Scientific Advisors[edit]

I notice that 4 out of 7 members of the Group of Chief Scientific Advisors have Wikipedia entries, and that the 3 who don't are women. I propose to create pages (I'm happy if someone else does it, to be clear) for these three people.

My question before I start: is being a member of this group a sufficient criterion for notability? Marcrr (talk) 12:07, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I would say that it definitely is. In fact, since the Advisors are chosen from the ranks of senior European scientists, I would say that by definition they fulfil the notability criterion in their own right, even not taking into account their role in the Commission. Randywombat (talk) 16:17, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]