Contents

Talk:ScoopWhoop

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: keep, 16 April 2016, see discussion. Withdrawn by nominator, 10 September 2015, see discussion.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ScoopWhoop article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments India Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello Moderators, Can you please point out the sections which seem advertorial or promotional to you so that I can convert them to a more neutral point of view. Thank You. Blessedhuman111 (talk) 03:44, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Blessedhuman111: There aren't "Moderators" per se; every editor is a steward of content here. You are free to remove the issue template yourself if you feel article is not advertorial. The tagging editor provided no rationale in edit summary or Talk page. If there is disagreement on its removal (or inclusion), ideally, interested parties will come to this Talk page and explain their reasoning (WP:BRD). You are strongly encouraged to make any necessary improvements you see fit to the article. Be bold in your editing. So get in there and start editing! ;) Namaste. -- dsprc ^[talk] 06:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss policy-based arguments about the inclusion (or exclusion) of this controversial content here. The mention is sourced, is of encyclopedic interest, and doesn't go into any unnecessary detail. However, the sentence could use a bit more relevant context (or an update, if newer information from reliable sources becomes available). In short, the current version may need additional tweaking but should be included in some form. GermanJoe (talk) 11:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]