Contents

Talk:Sequential (company)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Musical Instruments Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Professional sound production Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Product list

[edit]

The section Sequential (company)#Product list clearly ignore the important products of the company listed on [1]. It seems a kind of vandalism. We need accurate article without intentional obfuscation. --Clusternote (talk) 15:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful when accusing other editors of vandalism.

It isn't vandalism to remove content from articles based on Wikipedia policy. As I stated in my edit summary, the Wikipedia policies that apply here are WP:VERIFY (all information requires a high-quality source) and WP:INDISCRIMINATE (articles shouldn't just be context-free lists of stuff). Popcornfud (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before the revision 1149486045 of this article, the name field of citation tag ＜ref/＞ had been unnaturally obfuscated as following:

• name=":0" —— Keyboard magazine (October 2018)
• name=":1" —— Keyboard magazine (June 2013)
• name=":02" —— FACT magazine in 2017
• name=":2" —— FACT magazine in 2016
• name=":23" —— FACT magazine in 2016 (DUPLICATION of above!)
• name=":3" —— Dan Gentile's article in 2022
• name=":15" —— Peter Kirn's book in 2011

These obfuscations are inconvenient for other writers. Don't obfuscate these. --Clusternote (talk) 15:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These aren't intentionally obfuscated. They are the product of using the Wikipedia Visual Editor, which auto-generates refnames numerically. The refnames can be easily replaced with the RefNamer tool. Popcornfud (talk) 16:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]