Contents

Talk:Shark Trust

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shark Trust article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Organizations This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Sharks Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sharks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sharks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SharksWikipedia:WikiProject SharksTemplate:WikiProject Sharksshark articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 April 2019 and 1 September 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Razlozo.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 09:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am the WikiProject Shark founder, I have built up this stub to almost triple its size. I hope its better and more informative now. Lenny 08:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this is a really badly written article - i am assuming the author's english is not up to scratch?

there are several sentences that do not make sense, and far too many spelling mistakes

when i have the time i may attempt a clean up of this article, however, it would be good if the author was to do this himself

--jpk 22:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)jonyboyjpk 22/09/06 23:34[reply]

I haved gone through the article and done a bit of editing, although i didn't have time to do a great deal. A lot of the former text were just statements (The trust is... The Trust does... etc.) that appeared to be from the website so i tried to put them into sentences a bit more. More work is needed though. chris_huh 23:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Previously the article mentioned that 100 million sharks are killed by humans each year. I replaced this with "the populations of some shark species have been reduced to 2% of their original levels". Both statements come from the Shark Trust website. I think the latter option is better because it's relative, not absolute—it's not immediately intuitive to me whether 100 million shark kills across the globe per year would be sustainable. --Adrian J. Hunter 08:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]