This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Should either the "France" or "Accusations in Congress" sections mention the USS Deane which was launched in May 1778 and then renamed the Hague in 1782 (likely due to the printing of Deane's letters)? I had to remove mentioned of it from the "Legacy" section where it chronologically doesn't belong but is it a notable enough fact about Deane's job as a diplomat in France to mention? Libertybison (talk) 08:11, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Would this contemporary newspaper account/obituary of Deane's death have any effect on how this article should present Boyd's controversial/dubious theory that Deane was murdered, especially since the letter quoted is only dated three days after Deane's death?
IMHO, no. The (flimsy) argument can still be made that Bancroft poisoned Deane's medicine and that on the day Deane spoke with the captain, he happened to take some.--John Foxe (talk) 01:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]