Contents

Talk:Social justice warrior

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Social justice warrior article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days

Article milestones Date Process Result October 4, 2014 Proposed deletion Kept October 5, 2014 Proposed deletion Deleted November 28, 2014 Articles for deletion Merged January 28, 2016 Articles for deletion Kept April 7, 2016 WikiProject approved revision Diff to current version May 11, 2016 Good article nominee Not listed Afact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 7, 2016. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in August 2015, the term "social justice warrior" was one of several new words and phrases added to Oxford Dictionaries?

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 20 January 2016, see discussion. Merge to Social justice, 18 November 2014, see discussion.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Feminism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Human rights Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from hereorhere Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Linguistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Ethics Social and political philosophy Sociology: Social Movements Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the social movements task force. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Stephen Harrison (10 January 2018). "The Wikipedia entry for 'SJW' is a political battleground". The Outline.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is full of shit. There's so much bias here that I can't even distinguish this from an actual alt-right viewpoint. Why does Wikipedia always constantly side with right-wing biases? Rewrite it all, as it basically feeds towards legitimate terrorism.65.49.155.104 (talk) 23:03, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you list any specific examples of items that need to be changed or that represent this bias you are seeing? I know this reply is a bit late, coming a month after the comment, but without specific examples and supporting reliable sources, how do we know what to rewrite? King keudo (talk) 21:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SJW is not only used as a slur. It is a neutral term regardless of what the oxford dictionary states. Errenneff (talk) 15:35, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly Thehistorianisaac (talk) 23:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Without reliable sources that support this perspective, it cannot be included in this article. Newimpartial (talk) 01:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you honestly think this site sides with the right? I sure as hell doubt it. If anything, many websites side on with the agressive far left. No wonder Aussie metal band Thylacine wrote the song "Social Justice Wankers"! 49.187.86.179 (talk) 23:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the fact that this article is biased, but not to the right. This article seems more like a liberal rant. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 23:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain what makes you think this is biased towards a liberal rant? If there really is a bias in this article, said bias needs to be addressed to ensure the bias in the article is fixed to a more neutral POV and currently I don't see any bias on either side. DaisyGeekyTransGirl (talk) 06:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be more accurate to say that a Social justice warrior (SJW) is a pejorative term and internet meme mostly used for an individual who promotes extremist and uncompromising socially progressive, left-wing or liberal views, including feminism, civil rights, gay and transgender rights, and multiculturalism. Chinagreenelvis (talk) 14:17, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chinagreenelvis This is also what I thought it meant (to an extent) until I read the article and sources which leave out this "extreme" part. Do you have any sources which include it? Otherwise I think (from a quick glance) that the lead accurately reflects the sources. ―Panamitsu (talk) 21:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]