Contents

Talk:Solar still

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Environment: Sustainability Low‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Sustainability task force. Water Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:California Maritime Academy/Information Fluency in the Digital World (Spring 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

The article seems focused on a particular design of solar still, rather than solar still in general. There are multiple ways to design a solar still. Google "watercone solar still" for example. There are many more. The summary should be changed to reflect the wide range of designs, and this one should be included as a common "wilderness survival" type still. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.114.174.95 (talk) 06:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The link "http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SOLAR_DISTILLATION_PROJECT/ ( Make your own solar powered still) [Yahoo! group no longer active]" may as well be removed. It is no longer even possible to access old pages for it (the user is simply greeted with a page saying that the group is not found.)

The link titled "Compares the efficiency of several solar still methods" is very misleading. The article is actually quite fascinating, but the point of the article is not the comparison of different methods of solar distillation. The purpose of the article is to call into question the ubiquitous belief that solar stills are valuable in a survival setting. Great link, but the description should be something more like, "Alternative viewpoint on the effectiveness of solar stills."

Continuing on from the above comment, it would be nice to have a section on flat plate solar stills, there are numerous hits with Google, and I came here hoping for the usual Wikipedia unbiased description. I'm curious as to why Solar powered (via PV) Reverse osmosis units are preferred over direct distillation in flat plates, it would seem that the flat plate approach would be more energy efficient?? Salbayeng (talk) 22:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where does the input fluid go? 75.61.110.225 (talk) 10:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice if this article included some formulas to predict the water production of a solar still. Something like the area and temperature and amount of fluid is what I'm thinking but don't know if there is something like that. Crushacm (talk) 04:30, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you know this, but you can find many other images on Google images, as for other pages. --93.149.53.125 (talk) 21:14, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can replace it with the home page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.149.53.125 (talk) 21:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this and Condensation Trap not merged? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alrich44 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The contents of the Condensation trap page were merged into Solar still on 11 July 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Despite the name, it does not distill. The process is evaporation which is non-boiling vaporization from a surface not bulk. Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would disagree with the above note , fractional distillation and steam distillation do not use "boiling" of the bulk liquid, in general , I would think that bulk boiling would be bad thing as it would splash droplets around. Although some dictionaries dfefine distilation as boiling + condensation, most others define it as a process using evaporation and condensation. Also efficiency measures such as heat exchangers and pressure manipulation won't create bulk boiling. I also have a suspicion that "endothermic" salt solutions won't bulk boil anyway, as the thermodynamics will favour boiling at the surface.Salbayeng (talk) 21:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Solar still. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130923232246/http://theenergylibrary.com/node/11693tohttp://www.theenergylibrary.com/node/11693

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]