This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
I am against calling Ljubiša a "Montenegrin Serb writer" for several reasons. Firstly, he never lived in Montenegro and visited it only rarely. He was a Serb from Primorje (which I translated as the Littoral) which he emphasized on numerous occasions. Considering him Montenegrin for the reason that his birthplace is today part of Montenegro or because of his writing on Montenegrins would be a step towards incorrect. Petar II Petrović Njegoš is a Montenegrin Serb writer; Ljubiša could be Dalmatian Serb writer or even better a Serb writer from the Littoral. Secondly, he always considered himself being a Serb writer. Thirdly, he was certainly not a “Montenegrin Serb politician”! For the reasons of accuracy and understanding I propose erasing “Montenegrin”. --Dultz08:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
C'mon, Pax, you should know better... Where did you get that from? Anyone who read Ljubiša's stories can see that he makes a clear distinction between Paštrovići and Crnogorci that is Montenegrins. --Dultz00:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]