This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Merbabu wrote: "Why do you constantly revert this without explanation. I realise English is not your first language, but you would be well-advised to consider the English improvements of those who do."
"Supiori Regency is a regency in the Indonesian..." is convoluted and redundant. Why use "regency" twice? Why is it superior to "Supiori is a regency in the Indonesian..."? --Merbabu (talk) 06:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you're really just making it up, and it's redundant, and poor English - the word regency twice in 1 phrase is silly. It's clear it's a regency. --Merbabu (talk) 07:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So you say it is bad grammar despite it can be found all over Wikipedia? Maybe you start an community research or so. Maybe actually you are making it up that it is bad grammar? AsianGeographer (talk) 09:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: