 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Who initiates complete overhaul of a Wikipedia article? I'd start with a proper outline, then cut and paste the material as best I could to produce a coherent article that incorporated the comments by others. Since I have less than 100 hours of experience editing Wikipedia articles, a more seasoned editor would do a better job on the outline. On the other hand, I wrote a manual for creating a wide range of supportive / transitional houses in Alaska, USA. At the very least, I could work on bits and pieces and provide about 60 pounds of published source material. //Don K. (talk) 00:35, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to clean-up part of this article. There is no need to place "quotes" around certain terms like mental illnesses. I also removed link to specific types of centers as I see that as messy for the area I cleaned up, if you wish to link to specific types of centers for follow up information please do that when talking about the center or at the end of the article. Celtic Labyrinth 18:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
During my first visit to this article, I too worked to replace value judgments with NPOV. Given my interest and past work in this arena, I hope to contribute more after I become better informed and enhance my Wikipedia editing skills. In the meantime, other contributors may wish to see www.atlastahouse.org for information that might be incorporated into this article. //Don K. (talk) 20:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The content is massively biased, disingenuous and completely without substantive evidence to support most claims made e.g. the entire economic impact section is a farce, the only factor considered there is the cost to government of care. This reads like a government brochure for those as malleable as wet clay, not a well researched article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.51.248 (talk) 04:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
the article, as normal gives an american view of funding, provision and feasability bias. In the UK the systems are totally different, and funding makes it quite viable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.133.44.18 (talk) 10:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to the concerns noted above (some in place for years now), and the fact that the request for citations template has been in place since early '07, I placed the "advert" tag on the article in hopes of attracting attention to the list of problems with the entry. I might get to it eventually; somebody else can probably do it sooner and better. 67.187.111.107 (talk) 14:38, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Arequest has been submitted to WikiProject United States for a new article to be created on the topic of Housing in the United States. Please join the discussion or consider contributing to the new article. Best regards, -- M2545 (talk) 08:42, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
