Contents

Talk:Supreme People's Assembly

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Korea High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

merge Presidium into SPA[edit]

• support merging. One slightly larger and more complete article would be better than two tiny ones. Given the scarcity of concrete info about the workings of the SPA, neither article is likely to grow very much. --Reuben 06:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• support. Doesn't look like there is too much information on the Presidium - it's worth a section in the SPA article, not an article in its own right. If more information comes in later, we'll see, but for now... crazyeddie 05:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• support. Agreeing with above; Presidium should definitely be a section, not its own article. Sky 03:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• support; should be one article until we can get a major infusion of content. -- Visviva 09:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.asgp.info/Publications/CPI-English/1992_163_01-e.pdf#search=%2251%20seats%20korean%20social%20democratic%20party%20supreme%20people's%20assembly%22 is not a valid webpage. It is found in the second external link on this article mdkarazim 16:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Choe Thae Bok is Chairman of the Supreme People's Assembly. Kim Yong-nam is Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme People's Assembly

The result of the move request was: page moved per discussion below. Disambiguation from pages that do not exist at the current time is not necessary now. In particular, the articles Politics of Laos and Politics of Indonesia make no mention of a "Supreme People's Assembly" in those countries, despite the evidence below. If that information is somewhere in Wikipedia, then a hatnote to it would be useful at the top of this article. - GTBacchus^(talk) 09:27, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme People's Assembly (Democratic People's Republic of Korea) → Supreme People's Assembly — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC) The disambiguation is unnecessary. 128.135.207.5 (talk) 22:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. Mhiji (talk) 00:12, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Laos also had a Supreme People's Assembly. [1][2]... and Indonesia [3] - a disambiguation page should be built instead. 76.66.202.72 (talk) 03:41, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • But there aren't articles for the others... Your proposing creating a disambiguation page which has just one article in it?! Mhiji (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Then those articles should be disambiguated, since they are defunct. Int21h (talk) 08:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – the article title is too long so I suggest renaming to Supreme People's Assembly (North Korea) in line with the name of the country article (North Korea). Green Giant (talk) 04:26, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why disambiguate when it's not necessary? If other articles were created with a similar name then adding "(North Korea)" to disambiguate sounds sensible. Mhiji (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per WP:PRECISION. This article was at Supreme People's Assembly until May 2009 when it was moved with no reason given, and Supreme People's Assembly has redirected here since. There is nothing to disambiguate on WP. If and when an article is written about some other Supreme People's Assembly, then add "North Korea" if necessary. Station1 (talk) 23:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Support no disambiguation needed. Int21h (talk) 08:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Isn't the image outdated? I think the present composition includes a fourth represented group and different amounts of deputies etc. //Gotipe (talk) 01:10, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]