This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Swan Hill is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
The distance from melbourne is listed as 338km, but ive seen the distance noted as 344km. Can someone just confirm this is correct? Vauxhallx (talk) 14:33, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The further distance is likely via Bendigo which is not the most direct highway route. Google Maps travel directions if they are referencable shows this route as 337KM from Melbourne G.P.O. to the clock tower at the center of town in Swan Hill, opposite the Post Office (a Post Office outlet but not listed as G.P.O.) and is the closest direct highway route. Google MapsKING (talk) 05:40, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to one external link on Swan Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose to merge City of Swan Hill into Swan Hill. I think that the content in the City of Swan Hill article can easily be included in the context of Swan Hill, and the Swan Hill article is of a reasonable size that the merging of City of Swan Hill will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Jonathan O'Donnell (talk) 23:32, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - the whole Australian project has separation of the local government from locality articles, and is consistent with this practice - the precedent sent by this proposal simply would be disruptive and lack cognisance of the wider practice JarrahTree01:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Swan Hill Pioneer Settlement and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 25#Swan Hill Pioneer Settlement until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 07:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
