This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Sydney Football Stadium (2022) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Sydney Football Stadium (2022) is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby league, which aims to improve the quality and coverage of rugby league football related articles. Join us!Rugby leagueWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby leagueTemplate:WikiProject Rugby leaguerugby league articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
@GiantSnowman: It seems I need to clarify what "planned" means in this context – the stadium's construction has been funded and approved by the government. [1][2]. "Proposed" implies that it has neither. What the Garden Bridge has to do with this at all is beyond me. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk·articles·reviews) 12:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I know what planned means. Lots of things get planned but never come to fruition. The fact there is approval and funding is great, but actually irrelevant. What if there is a change in Government and approval is removed? What if the funding falls through? etc. GiantSnowman13:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@GiantSnowman:Reliable sources have verified that the stadium is planned to be built, therefore the use of "proposed" is inappropriate here. This is the factual current status of development. Trying to raise "what if"s about the future of the project would actually be the WP:CRYSTAL concern here. I hope you understand this. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk·articles·reviews) 14:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Throwing in an agreement with PhilipTerryGraham, "Planned" is not in any way WP:CRYSTAL concern in this context. It is planned to be built. Plans change, and "proposal" is inaccurate. Cerebral726 (talk)
Then why does the article open with "The New Sydney Football Stadium is a proposed football stadium in Moore Park, Sydney, Australia."? Change that and move this article to Planned Sydney Football Stadium] until such time as it is actually built (3 years away). And yes, "planned" is still CRYSTAL. Lots of things that are planned never happen. GiantSnowman16:56, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like the status of the project needs to be updated then, since plans have been made. Saying it's planned doesn't mean we are saying it is going to happen, it's just that plans have been laid out, arrangements have been made, etc. No specific predictions are being made, we are simply saying it is currently "planned." Cerebral726 (talk) 17:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Given the contract has now been signed and construction will commence shortly don't think any need for planned/proposed. It will be complete before the next election. Moa999 (talk) 22:58, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose at least for now. New Sydney Football Stadium is the commonly used working title, but the official name has not yet been confirmed. It may well end up not being named the Sydney Football Stadium. Suggest waiting until the new name is confirmed and then revisiting if required. Sydfacor (talk) 09:25, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose moving any other title to the base Sydney Football Stadium title at this time. The current stadium is what is usually meant by the search term at present. Changing the primary topic of "Sydney Football Stadium" will break any links to the current stadium. Dekimasuよ!10:33, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose New Sydney Football Stadium is fine for now. As stated in the previous discussion, it may not end up being named Sydney Football Stadium. It's completion date has now been pushed back until late 2022, and as this is a project that has suffered numerous delays already, could easily slip again. Think it best to wait until both the official name and opening date are confirmed and then deal with. Bromptop (talk) 06:59, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Bromptop: We'd have to deal with the current situation, though, not what we think is going to happen in the future. Unless you have an alternative proposal, "Sydney Football Stadium (2021)" is the only appropriate name at the moment that complies with precedent and resolves the relative time reference issue of the word "New". – PhilipTerryGraham (talk·articles·reviews) 06:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly, stating that it will be named the Sydney Football Stadium is crystal balling, it may well end up being named something else. Plenty of infrastructure projects are conceived under one name, only to be renamed by the time they are opened; Stadium Australia, Tallawong railway station, Newcastle Interchange and some of the light rail stops being examples. There will be a time to rename the article, but until we know what the name will be, don't see a pressing need when the current name is crystal clear as to what it is. Also, it is scheduled to open in 2022, not 2021. Bromptop (talk) 00:42, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose current, Support anything without "new". "New" is unencyclopedic. Encyclopedic material should be timeless. "New" is recentism. Also, it is not yet "new", because it does not yet exist. When it does exist, the next day it will no longer be new. Also, it will almost certainly have a new name by then. The generic name, with a parenthetical proposal or completion date would be OK. The proposed is OK. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Unfortunately, due to the vagaries of the English language, we can not consistently present this as "new" rather than "New"; my first impression on reading the title would be that "New Sydney" is part of the name, which I would guess would also be confusing to other readers. BD2412T14:51, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support (2022). "New" could be okay if that's how the media refered to it like they did with New Yankee Stadium. That is not the case for this stadium so we should use the estimated date of completion (2022) or some other disambiguator. BLAIXX18:25, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Should we either change Sydney Football Stadium to point to the 2022 article, or set it up as a disambiguation page? Or should the 2022 article be renamed Sydney Football Stadium after it opens as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC as is the case with Wembley Stadium and Wembley Stadium (1923)? Either way, 1,200 incoming links will need to be corrected. Verinaliad (talk) 10:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The South Sydney Rabbitohs played a game at Allianz Stadium in May and are now a semi-permanent tenant of the ground Talsta (talk) 11:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. EnIRtpf09bchat with me 10:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
