Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 GA Review  
63 comments  


1.1  Reply  





1.2  Notes  





1.3  Criteria  



1.3.1  Questions  


















Talk:Tamara Milashkina




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


WikiProject iconWomen in Green: Going Back in Time
WikiProject iconThis article was created or improved during the Going Back in Time GA edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Green project in June 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Tamara Milashkina/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gerda Arendt (talk · contribs) 17:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Viriditas (talk · contribs) 19:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

Thank you for the review! I nominated her because of the Women in Green drive. I will be out all day tomorrow, singing and opera, - please don't feel ignored. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no rush. It will take me at least another day to finish. Viriditas (talk) 21:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Very general reply: I was busy elsewhere on Wikipedia, and more so in real life, travelling and being with friends. I ha da chance to look only now, and am very impressed by what you found on top what's already there. I have two problems: I have no access to Grove, and I don't know Russian. Details below. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. I will request the Grove source to see if there's anything usable, but it's not a big deal, so don't worry about it for now. I think you misunderstood my concern about ru. It's not that you have to know Russian, but if you use the in-browser translation (or however you use your translation tools, Firefox does it automatically in my browser for me), you can easily see the missing material. Viriditas (talk) 21:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, if you like, I could make a detailed listing of this material to help you. At the very least, translate Grosheva (1983) to your preferred language of choice and make your way through the material. Viriditas (talk) 21:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's very generous. English preferred to not run into another translation problem. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've been adding the relevant parts of Grosheva 1983 to this review below. Viriditas (talk) 20:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I added from Grosheva to the article, seeing that you seem not to be afraid of "promotional" writing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

[edit]
I'll copy the comment to reply to the different topics:
  • Vasta 2002 talks about how Milashkina's voice fits into a Russian tradition of interpreting Verdi: "As for the dramatic sopranos--for our survey, none of the stereotypical edgy, wobbling variety--their timbral pattern follows not that of the mezzos, as one might expect, but that of the low male voices: the voice anchored as if at a low fundamental, supporting a rich low range and a dark, vibrant undertone elsewhere. Listen to Galina Vishnevskaya's luscious voicings of the Aida arias, or her Bolshoi colleague Tamara Milashkina's creamy singing of two of Desdemona's set pieces. Even the Moldovan soprano Maria Bieshu's large, narrow instrument "sits" on the middle As in the Don Carlo aria with a solid foundation."(Vasta, S. F. (July 2002). "From Russia con amore: the sound of Verdi, Russian style". Opera News, 67 (1), 40+.)
    I'd have no idea what to get from that.
  • American Record Guide's Richard Sininger, in a 2016 review of the 1974 Tosca recording describes Milashkina as a『big voice with a mezzo quality—somewhat typically Russian—and a secure, if not totally beautiful, top. At first her voice seems a bit monochromatic, but she delivers a good ‘Vissi d’Arte’ and sounds as if she acts well.』 (Sininger, Richard (Jan/Feb 2016). "Puccini: Tosca". American Record Guide. 79 (1): 151.)
    That's all not very specific, or what do you think?
    The point here, is that multiple sources discuss the difference that Russian opera singers bring to the table, primarily because of the isolation of the Soviet Union and the techniques of the opera schools. This is what the author means by "typically Russian", which is discussed elsewhere here. For me, the question I had was, what makes Milashkina different from other singers in her class and why. I find it quite fascinating to explore the reasons. Viriditas (talk) 21:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • A lot of the sources repeatedly describe her voice as "creamy".
    see above.
  • Osborne 2000 talks about the stultifying impact of the Soviet Union on the arts, and notes how Milashkina manages to stand out: "Because of the encapsulation of Soviet musical life, performance traditions froze. One of the fascinations of the era's recordings lies in the sense that one is listening to a Russian gloss on a style whose aesthetics had already faded elsewhere. With respect to the voices themselves, there is a rough correspondence to the historical progression seen across the past century in the West (a gradual erosion of technical command and interpretive individuality), but with a time lag and some interesting differences in how voices "set" within each category...For several decades, Russian singing methods seem to have worked out least well with high voices of the dramatic sort. The women tend to sound edgy and bumpy, the men steely and driven. Of the postwar spinto sopranos, Natalya Rozhdestvenskaya (Natalya in The Oprichnik, Fevronia in Kitezh) shows the most complete command, and Yevgenia Smolenskaya (Lisa in Queen of Spades, Militrissa in Tsar Saltan and the Yaroslavna of my ASCH Igor) settles into a surprisingly fine Ortrud. They are both stylistically authoritative artists, but the rounder, warmer timbres of later singers (Tamara Milashkina, then Guleghina and Gorchakova) probably will please more listeners."[4]
    I wouldn't know how much of the "typical Russian sound" the article should mention if she is described as of the "more pleasing kind.
    Resource exchange just sent me the Grove Online article. It says "She has a voice of distinctive timbre and unusual warmth and beauty; reserve and emotional depth combine to lend her stage portrayals particular sensitivity." (I.M. Yampol′sky 1992) Viriditas (talk) 00:47, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll get that in, and read further, whenI'll have time, which may be tomorrow. You should be a conom, and we let some else review, ow is that? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Added, please check. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    To answer your previous question about what "creamy" means in this context, I believe it refers in part to this description. Viriditas (talk) 02:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, Marina Mescheriakova: "Mescheriakova reveres her famous Bolshoi predecessors on the basis of their reputations. "Vishnevskaya was already gone when I arrived, and so was [Tamara] Milashkina. But I knew some things about them. When I was a child studying piano, maybe five years old, I heard a recording of Milashkina. It made a big impression. Beautiful sounds, beautiful meanings. I liked it because she was a singer with a dark color. When I began to sing, I did not imitate her, but I thought her voice was very close to mine."<ref>Bernheimer, M. (July 2002). "Marina Fortuna: the meaty Verdi soprano roles have been a string of good-luck charms for Marina Mescheriakova". Opera News.
    Sounds very personal to me, and rather general, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The point was that Milashkina has had a measurable impact on others, in this example, Marina Mescheriakova. Viriditas (talk) 21:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    taken now, thank you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Just adding this here: A French newspaper review of her 1970 Bolshoi tour compared her voice to Victoria de los Ángeles, but noted Milashkina differed from De los Ángeles with her "more luxurious, warmer, more trembling" voice. (Grosheva). Cited as E. Grosheva. "Tamara Milashkina". Singers of the Bolshoi Theatre of the USSR. Eleven portraits. Up to you whether to you use it or not, but if fits nicely in the section you created. Viriditas (talk) 19:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sections

References

  1. ^ Vasta, S. F. (July 2002). "From Russia con amore: the sound of Verdi, Russian style". Opera News, 67 (1), 40+.
  • ^ Sininger, Richard (Jan/Feb 2016). "Puccini: Tosca". American Record Guide. 79 (1): 151.
  • ^ Bernheimer, M. (July 2002). "Marina Fortuna: the meaty Verdi soprano roles have been a string of good-luck charms for Marina Mescheriakova". Opera News, 67(1), 12+.
  • ^ Osborne, C. L. (October 2000). "Russians in Amber. Opera News, 65(4), 54.
  • Criteria

    [edit]

    GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

    1. Is it well written?
      A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
      B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
      A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
      B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
      C. It contains no original research:
      D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
      No copyright or plagiarism detected.
    3. Is it broad in its coverage?
      A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
      Minor issues noted above. For reference, ru.wikipedia.org has unique info that does not appear here.
      B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
    4. Is it neutral?
      It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
      No neutrality issues detected.
    5. Is it stable?
      It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
    6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
      A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
      B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    7. Overall:
      Pass or Fail:
      Minor issues for nominator to review listed in order of importance:
      1) The idea that Milashkina "first worked as a librarian" is unclear, and may be a translation error. It appears she attended and graduated from a library college program. I do not see any indication that she worked as a librarian. Let's try to get this right.
      2) Other wikis have more information about the topic that does not appear here. For example, the entries at ru and fr. Fr uses the Grove Music source that should probably be looked at. Ru also has an image that isn't used here and goes into greater critical detail that could be used here (easily because it cites English language sources).
      I tried to find those sources in English, but found none, also found that several sources couldn't be found any more. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:17, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      3) We don't see the listing of all the awards and honors here like we do on ru and fr.
      see below: not without references --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:47, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      See above for new reference to the material. Viriditas (talk) 22:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      4) The Ru article is quite comprehensive and has a wealth of material, from discography to critical commentary from her peers, a filmography, and much more. I would like to see some effort to broaden the coverage here. The bio by Grosheva (1983) is probably a good place to start, as it is comprehensive up to 1983 and is three pages long.[11]. At best, just take a look and see if you can find anything to add. My guess is that there's a lot to do, even it means adding just appendices.
      This bio was published by the Bolshoi theatre, - did you see in recent DYK discussions that what Oper Frankfurt and Staatstheater Wiesbaden publish about their singers and stage directors was marked as "promotional", and use of it as reference as an ethical problem? Taking to External links. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:47, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    On hold. Viriditas (talk) 09:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Good work, Gerda. I am passing this article. Viriditas (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Questions

    [edit]

    The Russian Wikipedia has lists of awards, roles, recordings and films, but I can't detect references for them.

    Example: Awards

    Just published:[12] Viriditas (talk) 21:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for the find, that's great to have, also for other details, even if I'm afraid it's more or less a mirror of the ru Wikipedia. Will add after my morning round - in memory of Leoš Janáček and Kafka, going to upload pics of the latter - and today's RD article. Anything like it about films? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I moved the awards to the article, but the ref is good only for most, not all entries, - leaving some without. I also used the ref for other details. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's fine. The article looks great. Are we done, or do you want to do some more work? Viriditas (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    How do you feel about moving "Awards" to the bottom, after "Recordings"? Viriditas (talk) 22:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I think it's probably fine. I will pass now. Viriditas (talk) 22:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tamara_Milashkina&oldid=1232475991"

    Categories: 
    Wikipedia good articles
    Music good articles
    Wikipedia In the news articles
    GA-Class biography articles
    GA-Class biography (musicians) articles
    Low-importance biography (musicians) articles
    Musicians work group articles
    WikiProject Biography articles
    GA-Class Opera articles
    WikiProject Opera articles
    GA-Class Russia articles
    Low-importance Russia articles
    Low-importance GA-Class Russia articles
    GA-Class Russia (performing arts) articles
    Performing arts in Russia task force articles
    WikiProject Russia articles
    GA-Class Women in music articles
    Low-importance Women in music articles
    WikiProject Women in Music articles
    Wikipedia Did you know articles
    Articles created or improved during WikiProject Europe's 10,000 Challenge
    WikiProject Women in Green meetup 6 articles
    All WikiProject Women in Green pages
     



    This page was last edited on 3 July 2024, at 22:41 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki