Contents

Talk:Tehom

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bible Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Judaism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Kabbalah (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kabbalah, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.KabbalahWikipedia:WikiProject KabbalahTemplate:WikiProject KabbalahKabbalah articles Mythology Low‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion: Interfaith Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive. Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ancient Near East Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

What's up with "Tehwom"? That's just a mis-reading of the Hebrew spelling. There is no consonantal /w/ in the word. It should be deleted.

check the reference to Genesis 51:10. it does not exist.

(I assume the above is supposed to read Isaiah 51:10, as Gen 51:10 indeed does not exist.)

The word tehom is not cognate to Tiamat according to the majority view that Tiamat is from Sumerian meaning mother of life while tehom is from the Semitic root t-h-m found also in Ugaritic meaning the ocean. It is cognate to Akkadian tamtu which is NOT another name for Tiamat, in fact not a name at all but again simply the word for ocean. Please stop cranky "Bible-is-derived-from-paganism" innuendo POV edits in this regard. The tehom = Tiamat claim is a well known error thoroughly discussed and dismissed already in the 1930s, see The Language of the Pentateuch in its Relation to Egyptian by A.S. Yahuda, Oxford University Press, 1933. Kuratowski's Ghost (talk) 03:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately for Mr Yahuda, his views haven't left any impression on later scholarship :) PiCo (talk) 06:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not true at all, his work is still regularly cited. Kuratowski's Ghost (talk) 11:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In this humble editor's view, the controversy above should be made explicit but inconclusive in the article itself. Simply declaring that an error is 'well known' or that someone's work is 'regularly cited' is dangerously close to weasel-wording, and it strikes us that making rigid, clear pronouncements about the meaning of ancient words is an exercise in folly. 70.89.20.65 (talk) 18:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The line from the Hebrew Bible needs to be transliterated in some standard, and consistent, way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhutamsa (talk • contribs) 01:51, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]