Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Background  
1 comment  




2 outright bias  
1 comment  




3 is this a place to suggest edits to the page?  
3 comments  













Talk:The BioLogos Foundation




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Background[edit]

In the article on theistic evolution is found the following:

"Theistic evolution or evolutionary creation is a concept that asserts that classical religious teachings about God are compatible with the modern scientific understanding about biological evolution. In short, theistic evolutionists believe that there is a God, that God is the creator of the material universe and (by consequence) all life within, and that biological evolution is simply a natural process within that creation. Evolution, according to this view, is simply a tool that God employed to develop human life.'

In this article the definition of theistic evolution, as copied from the Biologos webpage is something to the effect that God used evolution to create life.

These seem to be conflicting statements. I thought that theistic evolution described how the process of evolution occured as a natural process after God created life?Desoto10 (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

outright bias[edit]

The section about BioLogos is incredibly patronizing. I'm sure there are more eminent people who support it. Right now the article seems to suggest that the U of Chicago hack made some grand point about the frivolity of the organization. It seems a bit ridiculous to include the petty disrespect of some pathetic leftist on the page of the first man to map the humane genome. He doesn't even raise a good point about the organization, just slanders it in a way that could be done to absolutely any organization in existence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.35.93 (talk) 14:20, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

is this a place to suggest edits to the page?[edit]

I have a COI in that I have worked with BioLogos in the past and prefer to suggest edits to the page rather than make them directly. Sswamida (talk) 14:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are in the right place. --Hob Gadling (talk) 11:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


I think the fact that BioLogos recently acknowledged several changes to their scientific position on Adam and Eve is notable and worth including in this article. [1] 24.207.136.42 (talk) 18:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_BioLogos_Foundation&oldid=1219371659"

Categories: 
Start-Class Christianity articles
Mid-importance Christianity articles
WikiProject Christianity articles
Start-Class organization articles
Unknown-importance organization articles
WikiProject Organizations articles
Start-Class science articles
Mid-importance science articles
 



This page was last edited on 17 April 2024, at 10:44 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki