This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles
I added the gallery of 30 ogg files that I found on Wikimedia Commons. You might instead prefer a link out to a review of Bergman's 1977 film that is under construction in Wikiversity at v:Movie Reviews/The Magic Flute. I might add that this collection from Commons has value even though one can always find a rendition of this opera for free on the internet: Unlike YouTube or other online sites, this version is guaranteed to be stable and free of advertisements. Also, my German is Nicht gut, and I was constrained to use short titles. You might want to edit that.--Guy vandegrift (talk) 21:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for that gallery. However, it now duplicates 4 numbers from the 1953 Fricsay recording. I don't like those numbers removed from their textual context, so I don't know how to avoid the duplication. Placing all 30 files in the text would leave no room for pictures, unless we sandwich the text. So I guess we have to live with that duplication.
As for the English translations: I strongly suggest to retain the original German incipits – they are universally much better recognized. Further, it would be helpful if we could align the numerals (currently 1–30) of the sound files to the numbering in the score (Overture, 1–21). Maybe the sound files could be joined in a table with the current list "Musical numbers". I will try that within the next few days. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:41, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't edit Wikipedia much, but agree that you should use German labels if you can't find reputable translations. Opinions don't count for much on this wiki. Also, consider putting the entire collection on Commons (with linkouts from Wikipedia and Wikiversity.) If we put it on Commons, I might be able use the subst: template option to format the wikitext on a wiki without resorting to templates (though I personally prefer the simple gallery.) Another option is to put the collection on Wikipedia's Deutsches_Symphonie-Orchester_Berlin.--Guy vandegrift (talk) 03:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) Thanks for showing how this might work using {{Audio}}. After you reminded me above about that template, I, too, thought this would be be the simplest option, and your example shows indeed how simple and non-intrusive it is. However, the disadvantage of {{Audio}} is its lack of player controls – it only does "Stop" and "Restart from beginning", no "Continue". The thumbnail presentation only offers "Start", "Pause", "Continue" (no "Restart from the beginning"), but the template {{Listen}} offers "Start", "Pause", "Continue", and a slider to position the playback forward or backward, and it shows the track's duration; it does not allow to change the width of the playback bar. On balance, I think that's what I would like to implement. You can see this method at Christmas Oratorio#Part I. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Christmas Oratorio#Part 1 would be a better template, but looks difficult to create. Are you good at making Wikitables? Do you need any help? Meanwhile, I will quickly finish my simpler version an post it on Wikiversity with a call for student essays. The quickest way to contact me is at Wikiversity:User talk:Guy vandegrift, but I will also monitor this page and keep you posted on my progress.--Guy vandegrift (talk) 02:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From The_Magic_Flute#Musical_numbers it looks like your implementation time was a "a day or less". My only comment involves your objection to {{Audio}}. Are you aware that there are two ways to play ⓘ?... My computer shows two consecutive icons. The first looks like a speaker and plays the song without showing you anything. And, you can only start and pause (unable to restart.) But my computer shows a small superscript circle with "i" in the center (after the speaker.) Clicking the superscript takes you to Commons where you have full control over "stop/start/pause". The icons look better if you put them in front of the text:
Act 1
ⓘ Introduction: "Zu Hilfe! Zu Hilfe! Sonst bin ich verloren" – Tamino, Three Ladies
ⓘ Aria:『Der Vogelfänger bin ich ja』(The birdcatcher am I) – Papageno
... or maybe sans numerals like this:
Act 1
ⓘ Introduction: "Zu Hilfe! Zu Hilfe! Sonst bin ich verloren" – Tamino, Three Ladies
ⓘ Aria:『Der Vogelfänger bin ich ja』(The birdcatcher am I) – Papageno
I know that clicking the information icon ⓘof{{Audio}} takes the reader to the file on Commons. But that takes us back to the behaviour of that template before the introduction the Phonos MediaWiki extension a few months ago and defeats the feature of playing audio inline without leaving the article. As I wrote before, on balance the template {{Listen}} works better here, with some penalties in the bulkiness department. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you mean - it's no trouble for me because I can open as a new tab, but the typical reader is likely to get bewildered. ... I think I will use your template and see if I can simplify and compress the size: My goal is a gateway experience on a page about writing movie reviews, and an intended audience that has no a priori interest in the opera. It will link out to this Wikipedia article. Thanks for doing all this.--Guy vandegrift (talk) 14:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
