Contents

Talk:The New Yorker

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The New Yorker article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 180 days

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Magazines High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. Media This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Mackay Radio Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments Comics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This may be too trivial to put in the article, but I will note here that currently, the date shown on the cover of each issue is a Monday, whereas it used to be Saturday. This change happened when the issue dated June 23, 1973, was followed by one dated July 2. I don't know the reason for the change. Richard K. Carson (talk) 23:16, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Under the Fact Checking section, the line:

>In 2019, the Columbia Journalism Review said that "no publication has been more consistently identified with its rigorous fact-checking".

seems to imply that this is some kind of ranking awarded in 2019. The context of the cited article however reflects the reputation of the New Yorker over it's entire lifetime. Perhaps this could be reworded to better reflect the statement in the original article. 24.148.35.9 (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]