Contents

Talk:The Nine Days

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 28, 2014, July 16, 2015, August 4, 2016, and July 23, 2017.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Time Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Judaism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Holidays This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

World War I began on the 28th of July, 1914 and that was the 5th of Av, 5674. It was not the 9th of Av. This should be changed. It can still stay in the article, however, as it is a melancholy event that began during "the nine days."

(http://www.hebcal.com/converter/?gd=28&gm=7&gy=1914&g2h=Comput..)

Why is this article a stub, it does not seem to be lacking anything. the hebrew version says the same thing and it is not a stub. Jon513 19:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think we need more than 10 short sentences in order for the article not to be a stub. Standards differ from Wikipedia to Wikipedia. gidonb 14:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the page should be moved back to The Nine Days. The period is frequently referred to by that name, making it a proper noun. The Ten Martyrs is also capitalized for similar reasons. I will move the page back if noone objects. --Eliyak 23:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. A google search for nine days reveals that almost all website capitalize "the nine days" it in the middle of a sentence. Jon513 01:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"The Nine Days" is an Ashkenazic custom. Sephardic, Yeminite, and other customs don't start prohibitions of limiting meat eating or bathing until the week of, and the term is "The week of". I think this page would be better labled as Mishenichnas Av or something, and then explain the various prohibitions and how some customs believe in "Three Weeks", "Nine Days", or "Week of".— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.139.153.169 (talk • contribs) [1]

Very good point the nine days is an Ashkenazic extension, the shulchan aruch only mentions the week of tisha b'av as point of change.Saxophonemn (talk) 18:51, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of this article is extremely low. The section on the nine days in the page The Three Weeks is higher, even though it is short. As the previous editor mentioned--the article does not differentiate between Ashkenazi custom and accepted halakha, which is a major flaw. Plus, it does not have enough detail to be valuable. I recommend deleting this page, unless and until someone can write a page with more info than is in The Three Weeks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.198.152.98 (talk • contribs) [2]

Discussion about the correct names for the First and Second Temples at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Building and destroying the Beit Hamikdash. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 07:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nine Days really needs moving to Nine Days (band) and Nine Days becoming a dab page like Three Days. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:22, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]