This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
It was tagged as a requested article in comics - I can't imagine that it wouldn't be notable, frankly. It was quite a big deal when it came out, is widely cited in articles on the series, and it should be easy to find substantial reviews of it. Phil Sandifer (talk) 16:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any of these citations? Those would make the article much easier to defend and much more meaningful, even if it were eventually merged.--Doug.(talk • contribs)00:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not handy - though I can tell you that it's routinely cited in stuff from the next issue of ImageTexT that we're putting out (which is a special issue on Gaiman). Try Google Scholar. Phil Sandifer (talk) 01:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't plan on spending any more time on this article, but here goes. I do not own this book. I am a big fan of Gaiman's body of work, and Sandman was my first introduction to it; however, this book seems like nothing more than a reference. From what I've seen from google (I haven't checked google scholar), it is a collection of interviews with Gaiman about Sandman that enhances the reader's understanding of the series. I do not know why it would warrant its own article, but I understand that it would be an invaluable resource in fleshing out the Sandman (Vertigo) article. I have not read WP: Notability, I do not plan to contribute to the article other than protecting it from vandals and some minor copy-edit suggestions. My problem is, and I'm sure this has been resolved elsewhere, is every reference worthy of its own article? joshschr (Talk | contribs) 02:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
