This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofSouth Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Tim Johnson (South Dakota politician) is part of WikiProject Lutheranism, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.LutheranismWikipedia:WikiProject LutheranismTemplate:WikiProject LutheranismLutheranism articles
This article is crap. There is bias in the language and some of the sentences have nothing to do with him at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.220.238.140 (talk • contribs)
I agree with you. What the f*** is up with this article? Jim16
The edits by 66.234.34.141 belong to me -- apparently I got logged out without noticing. I've rewritten parts of the article and removed some of the extraneous Daschle material which belongs elsewhere, although I think it's legitimate to mention his re-election race's status as a proxy battle between Bush and Daschle here. Unless there's further objection, I'll remove the NPOV notice one week from today. --Polonius00:13, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The stuff about the proxy battle between George W. Bush and Tom Daschle really doesn't belong there, even though you said it did. Please discuss this on my talk page with me. (Note: the earlier edit by 66.17.116.148 was actually me because I forgot to sign in. Have a nice day.Jim1605:31, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All right; what's your reasoning why not? The fact that it was seen as a proxy battle is not in dispute; noting it here requires one sentence and recognises an important dynamic of his re-election race. Certainly, I wouldn't want to go into more detail than this, but, as it stands, I think it's useful information. --Polonius14:40, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In the absence of a reply, I'm removing the NPOV warning. If anyone still has a problem, please explain why on this page when you reinstate the flag. --Polonius19:46, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
10 YEAR UPDATE - I tried to clean up some of the worst NPOV violations, but work still needs to be done in the "Political positions" section (it read like a press release). The section also lacks many citations. Jsniessen (talk) 14:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The specifics of how a senator is replaced need to be double-checked. I'm pretty sure (and heard on the news) that an appointed replacement senator serves until the term expires; no special elections are held. --ChrisDC00:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's given in the sourced legislation. [1]. -4 says he "may fill by temporary appointment, until a special election is held pursuant to this chapter". -1 describes the methods of a special election to Congress, basically "in three months time".
-5 appears to contradict this, saying wait until next election, but I think it's irrelevant - it just talks about "the senate", whilst the other sections talk about "the United States Senate", suggesting it's meaning the state senate only. Unfortunately, it isn't explicit about this... Shimgray | talk | 00:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ignore all that - I was wrong. It looks very definitely like the special elections requirement in -1 only refers to Representatives - I keep forgetting that that only refers to members of the lower house and not to both. Appointment followed by special election at the next general election, whenever that is - 2008, presumably. Shimgray | talk | 00:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just to note, the replacement would serve, at best, through the 110th congress. In this case, that would be the whole of Johnson's remaining term, but would not necessarily be. As to how replacing senators work, my understanding is that it differs by state. Pennsylvania, for instance, had a special election in fall 1993 after Senator Heinz's death. john k
It does, and on the length of time remaining in the term; Bob Menendez, for example, was simply appointed for the last year of a term, before he was elected. Presumably provisions for incapacity also vary; Carter Glass held his seat for a term and a half before his death, despite usually being unable to attend the Senate. SeptentrionalisPMAnderson23:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
According to MSNBC, Tim Johnson's office just said that he did not have a stroke, but is under medical evaluation...can someone check to confirm this?viperdude908 08:00 p.m, 13 December 2006
I heard it was a "congenital arteriovenal malformation", which I think means that he had fucked-up blood vessels from birth, and that it had led to bleeding on the brain. 204.52.215.1319:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unless I am greatly mistaken, all of Chapter 12-11 (see below) applies to the United States Congress. Section 12-11-1 makes it clear that a U.S. Senate temporary appointment would result in a special election within 90 days. Section 12-11-5 makes this unclear. —MJBurrage • TALK • 01:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
12-11-1 Special election to fill congressional vacancy—Time of election of representative. If a vacancy occurs in the office of a senator or representative in the United States Congress it shall be the duty of the Governor within ten days of the occurrence, to issue a proclamation setting the date of and calling for a special election for the purpose of filling such vacancy. If either a primary or general election is to be held within six months, an election to fill a vacancy in the office of representative in the United States Congress shall be held in conjunction with that election, otherwise the election shall be held not less than eighty nor more than ninety days after the vacancy occurs.
12-11-2 Filing of election proclamation—Notice to county auditors and political parties—Nominations. The proclamation issued pursuant to § 12-11-1 shall be filed with the secretary of state who shall, if a special election is called for, thereupon notify each county auditor and the chairman of each political party recognized pursuant to chapter 12-5 of the date and purpose thereof. The State Central Committee of each political party so recognized shall be entitled to nominate a person to fill such vacancy and independent candidates filing nominating petitions meeting the requirements of § 12-7-1 may also have their names placed on the ballot.
12-11-3 Filing of nominations—Certification—Conduct of elections. Each party nomination and independent petition shall be filed with the secretary of state not less than forty-five days preceding any election which is not combined with a primary or general election. If the election is conducted with a primary election, each party nomination and independent petition shall be filed by the first Tuesday in April. Each nomination shall be certified in a like manner as any other nomination for the purpose of a general election. The election shall be conducted, canvassed, and the results certified as in a general election. If the election is conducted with a general election, each party nomination and independent petition shall be filed by the second Tuesday in August.
12-11-4 Temporary appointment by Governor to fill vacancy in United States Senate. Pursuant to the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, the Governor may fill by temporary appointment, until a special election is held pursuant to this chapter, vacancies in the office of senator in the Senate of the United States.
12-11-5 Special election to fill senate vacancy. The special election to fill the vacancy of a senator shall be held at the same time as the next general election. The general election laws shall apply unless inconsistent with this chapter.
12-11-6 No special election if appointed senator's term expires at normal time. No special election, to fill a vacancy, may be held if the term of office of the appointed senator expires in the month of January immediately following the next general election that would occur after the vacancy.
12-11-7 Vacancy within ninety days of general election—Concurrent elections. If a vacancy occurs within ninety days of the next general election, the special election to fill the vacancy shall be held concurrently with the general election to be held two years later.
12-11-8 Nominations for specially elected senator—Vacancy near primary election. Nominations of candidates for the special election for senator shall be conducted pursuant to chapter 12-6. If a vacancy occurs within ninety days of the date of the primary election, or between the primary election and at least ninety days prior to the general election, the provisions of §§ 12-11-2 and 12-11-3 shall apply.
It's a bit deceiving at first glance. Section 12-11-1 says that, for a representative or a senator, the governor must "issue a proclamation setting the date of and calling for a special election for the purpose of filling such vacancy." However, the next sentence only sets the time frame for filling "a vacancy in the office of representative in the United States Congress," not for a senator. That would seem to leave the matter up to section 12-11-5. -- ChrisDC21:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is a lot of material here to expand on, especially the Senator's recent cancer treatment. If someone could include that information, please do. --Daysleeper4713:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think the health information is out of place near the top of the entry. I also think it's redundant to have it at the top and the bottom of the entry. Perhaps one sentence near the top, stating that Johnson fell ill on December 13, 2006, with a reference to more information in the Health section would be appropriate. Mikehillman19:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a news article. The part about what happens if he has to resign, which I might add there is no sign of, is not needed. State his health condition and then move on. This is a bio, not a CNN article.
Actually, it's a Wikipedia page, among whose characteristics is the ability to change swiftly to reflect important new information. Tim Johnson's medical condition may tip power in the U.S. Senate. Leaving that out would slight Wikipedia and its readers. PRRfan15:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How is putting in that Mike Rounds would name a replacement IF he resigns slighting readers? He's alive for Christ sakes. Let's also add what his wife would do if he dies. Or what his kids/grandchildren/friends/family will do. We sure don't want to slight Wikipedia and its readers. We also need to put on every senator's page what happens if they resign or die, because we don't want to slight Wikipedia and its readers. LightningOffense04:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I can't quite make out your argument. In any case, in a single day Johnson went from being one of the more obscure members of the U.S. Senate to front-page news and a potential fulcrum of power. Perhaps Johnson will recover and his medical condition will become of concern to him and his family alone. But for now, it's the only reason Johnson is the talk of Washington. By the way, use four tildes (~~~~) to generate your sig. PRRfan23:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, help here please!! You guys had a sentence repeated in the paragraph--about Johnson's being responsive to touch and voice. When I deleted it the copy went funny. Sorry. Yopienso21:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It has been over a week now since Sen. Johnson had his "stroke like symptoms" and he is still alive and according to all reports, he will likely make a full recovery. I think it is time to start discussing the removal of what happens if he were to die in office. LightningOffense01:06, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, I don't think so. The potential effect of Johnson's malady on the U.S. Senate remains, with all due respect to his family and friends, the most significant thing about him. It may well remain so even if, as now seems likely but by no means certain, he recovers fully. LO, what's your rush? Wikipedia is not, after all, paper. PRRfan06:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The comment about his lack of recent public appearance uses the word aneurysm, but that is distinct from an arteriovenous malformation. While often conflated, they are distinct conditions, even when a rupture of the blood vessels occurs as a result of an AVM. -- Alcourt13:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is Wikipedia. Not some nutjob conspiracy site. And I say that as a Democrat. Seriously, the guy had an inherited condition and some bad luck. Get over it. 71.42.68.24516:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And we can keep an open mind that he's an alien from mars. There's no facts saying yes, but there's none saying he isn't, yet. Conspiracies aside, try to have objective facts. Speculation can abound, but unless you can provide evidence, such as medical reports and links to biological, chemical, or radiological elements that cause his condition, it's just that. Wild speculation. 63.95.218.25416:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This section is all very interesting information, which nonetheless probably doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article, certainly not this article. If Senator Johnson makes a full recovery before the end of his term, this section will be removed. If Sentator Johnson resigns/dies, this section will be removed (and replaced with something like "Senator Johnson was replaced by so-and-so on his resignation/death"). I suggest removing the section, adding a sentence to the previous paragraph on his latest health problems along the lines of "The Senator's illness led several media commentators to speculate on how his possible death or resignation would affect the balance of power in the Senate. [insert some references here]". CyborgTosser (Only half the battle) 23:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with post. I have tried to get rid of this section, but somebody always put it back in. It certainly appears that the will not have to resign before his term is up. LightningOffense23:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While I disagree about the topic being unencyclopedic - I think procedure in replacing a Senate vacancy is very encyclopedic and should be included somewhere, perhaps United States Senate - I do agree that the section is becoming increasingly irrelevant to this subject. Since the initial illness in December, there has been no publication indicating there will be a resignation or death of this person and what has been published only speaks of recovery. I support the removal of this section unless something changes. --Oakshade23:58, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think I overgeneralized when I said the information didn't belong in an encyclopedia. I certainly agree that procedure in replacing a Senate vacancy belongs in an article (not this one) and I would also like to see a list of occurrences of a Senator being replaced. I think we probably need an article on "appointment to vacatated United States Congress seats" (title to be discussed; too bad their isn't a widely used word like "succession" for the Presidency). Such an article would also provide a good place for contrasting examples of members of Congress continuing to serve while in poor health. If Tim Johnson begins serving actively again before he has made a full recovery medically, then perhaps such a comparison would be relevant here, but until that happens, I don't think it is very relevant except to a particular speculated outcome.
What I don't think belongs in any encyclopedia article is in-depth discussion on the potential effects on the "balance of power". This speculation is political commentary, which further I have a hard time believing will be remembered much less relevant a year from now. I say rather than speculating, we should let events play out and if the outcome has historical importance, we can reintroduce this into the article at that time.CyborgTosser (Only half the battle) 07:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree; it's increasingly irrelevant to this article. I removed the heading and first paragraph, while retaining the relevant (IMO) points about other senators' having served while very ill and/or incapacitated.--HughGRex00:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Should there be a full recovery and he's back in the Senate at work (the probable case), the paragraph should be reduced further like the cancer occurrence one. It's kind of embarassing that the "Health" section has more content than the "United States Senate" section does. --Oakshade02:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The "United States Senate" section is rather shallow, isn't it? I hope that someone who knows Johnson's record much better than I will take this opportunity to expand the section. What committees has he served on? What bills has he introduced?--HughGRex10:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since Senator Johnson is suppose to be back to work on September 5 (I think that was the day), I purpose that this article be changed and the ramifications of death section be either greatly rewritten or removed all together. Obviously, the change shouldn't be made until that date. Anybody have any thoughts on that? LightningOffense20:08, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Now that he's returned to work, I put referenced content describing that and removed the now off-topic section about the ramifications if a Senator resigns from office. --Oakshade05:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Following LightningOffense's edit, I restored the following paragraph:
Senate precedent has seen members serve despite disabling physical illness. Several senators, including Karl Mundt (R-SD), have served out terms while disabled.[1] Others have requested leaves for surgery or illness, which have been granted by the Senate, and the members returned after recovery. In one often-cited instance of a Senator serving despite disability, in 1964 Senator Clair Engle (D-CA), who was suffering from brain cancer, was wheeled into the Senate and pointed to his eye, signifying his vote to end a filibuster against the passage of the Civil Rights Act[2] ("eye" is a homophone with "aye", the term used in Congress to signify an affirming vote).
Although LightningOffense believes this paragraph belongs in the United States Senate article, it's not there currently. (Perhaps it should be added to the Senate article.) More to the point, I believe that it's directly relevant to Johnson's current position. Wikipedia readers who want to know about the ramifications of his health situation (and any precedents that might be relevant) are more likely to come to this article than to the Senate article. Let's continue to give them what they want.--HughGRex11:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The point Michael Moore reference confuses the point. While it was true at that time that Johnson was the only Senator with a son or daughter in the military, that is no longer the case. That language probably needs to be tightened up to more strongly reference that the distinction either isn't true anymore, or was true at that point in time.
While some clarification may be in order, the two sentences when read together are clear that Johnson was the only one with a son in the military "when American invaded Iraq." I've added "at the time" to the end of the Moore reference to make it more clear. However, to my knowledge, Johnson is still the only Senator or with a child serving in the military. The distinction I've always read was that while some members of Congress had sons or daughters in the military, those children served as officers. Johnson holds the distinction of being the only Senator with a child in the enlisted ranks, and by far is the only one with a son directly involved in both the war in Afghanistan and the war in Iraq.Dcmacnut23:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding the clarifying language. Jim Webb's son Jimmy is currently a Marine lance corporal and served in Iraq after dropping out of Penn State to enlist.
I completely forgot about Webb. And I even followed that race closely and knew all about him wearing his son's combat boots.Dcmacnut02:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kabulykos
How is any of the "other members of congress have children in the military" specifically relevant to Tim Johnson bio or family info? It just smells like a (now-extremely-dated) attack on Michael Moore's credibility. Off topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kabulykos (talk • contribs) 07:34, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to one external link on Tim Johnson (South Dakota politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 3 external links on Tim Johnson (South Dakota politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified one external link on Tim Johnson (South Dakota politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
