This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
I am in the midst of editing this article. I expect to finish it by 8 August 2006. I urge Wikipedians to refrain from making any major edits, as it is a work in progress.
--DavidShankBone07:41, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the material on the police riots ought to be its own article. In the context of an article about a park that's been around for a century and a half (and been the site of several riots), it's an excessive focus on one important but not definitive event. Nareek17:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree and thought about that once I wrote it. If one of you want to create a page and write a synopsis on the main TSP page, you're more than welcome, but I only began the riot article last night and it's unfinished, needs work. I request you refrain from editing the riot article itself until I finish it. Then you all can have at it. Right now I need to go get a an air cast. --DavidShankBone17:14, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone ahead and moved it to a sub-article, and put a summary in the main article. Other than that, have at it. But since this is Wikipedia anyone can edit the article... you can't really reserve articles, except to let people know you're going to be making changes. So anyway, it's at Tompkins Square Park Riot and I've tidied it up a bit but am done for now. --W.marsh17:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Nareek, I had the same question. It can definitely be taken off Tompkins Square Park, all of it, because the editor also included it on the Tompkins Square Park Police Riot page - no need for the duplication. A policy I have for the pages I create is not to take something out, but to edit it and try to cite it, if worthy of inclusion. I haven't had time to do that, but I need to do so b/c I recently nominated that page for a Good Article. I don't think it's there, but I want to get insight from other editors on how to improve it. This addition, at least until I can focus my Lexis-Nexis account on it, has hurt the quality of my article as is. But there may be information in there that will improve it; nevertheless, you can delete it off this page. --DavidShankBone20:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
monument for the General Slocum boating disaster[edit]