| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Traffic (conservation programme) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The name should be "Traffic", per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks). -- JHunterJ 22:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine to merge this page with the TRAFFIC International page. NOTE: the name TRAFFIC should be in captial letters as it originally started life as an acronym, but this is no longer used. [[Richard Thomas, Communications Co-ordinator, TRAFFIC International] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.82.96.166 (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Logo TRAFFIC.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This section has virtually no references and the only ones it does have are to their own website, a COIU editor is edit warring to retain it. the section needs re-writing in prose with suitable third party sources ALL claims/puffery MUST be referenced to WP:reliable sources Theroadislong (talk) 12:06, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Consensus is against moving. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Traffic (conservation programme) → TRAFFIC – The article uses "TRAFFIC" throughout and that title is just a redirect to the page. The disambiguation in the current title is therefore unneeded. – Deli nk (talk) 15:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Lonely Planet Vietnam Lonely Planet, Iain Stewart, Brett Atkinson - 2014 "Wildlife poaching has decimated forests of animals; snares capture and kill indiscriminately, whether animals are common or critically endangered. Figures are very difficult to ascertain, but a 2007 survey by wildlife trade monitoring organisation Traffic estimated that a million ... in 2013 the World Wildlife Fund and Traffic (the wildlife trade monitoring network) launched a campaign in Vietnam to counter its ."
I removed the advert tag and replaced it with a "citations for verification" tag. Recent edits seem to have taken care of the problem with promotional material, but the article still lacks independent, third-party published sources per Wikipedia:Verifiability. Coconutporkpie (talk) 01:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Traffic (conservation programme). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have read through about a third of this articles page so far. It concerns me that there seem to be quite a few rather important looking red links that I believe should have pages. It makes me wonder why they are missing from Wikipedia? -- Ubh [talk... contribs...] 11:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 1 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rhin0771 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ungulate01.
— Assignment last updated by Otter246 (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The history section of this article begins in the 1990's, despite TRAFFIC having existed since 1976. That's a decade and a half of missing history. RedKnight7146 (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
