This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
To the individual who removed my edits... why? Who are you to deem what is appropriate, and what isn't? Factual information about the city seems appropriate to me. 9/14/06 10:22 AM - WALRUS
While I can't speak for other editors, the factualness of an entry is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for inclusion in an encyclopedia. For example, the statement "Joe Smith used to run a gas station in Two Rivers, but doesn't anymore" might be true, but it is not notable for an encyclopedia article about the city. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. (That said, some of your contributions have been included in the article in a more appropriate fashion) --ZimZalaBim (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. You've allowed my stuff twice now. I have no beef with you. While some of my edits may have been unimportant, a lot of it was worthy. So thank you for putting them back up. Hopefully it won't be removed by others again. 9/14/06 11:13 AM - WALRUS
I have just modified 3 external links on Two Rivers, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
